By Felix Salmon
December 16, 2009

" data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

Tyler Cowen on whether we should read great thinkers or their distillers. I agree, but: Kripke on Wittgenstein — MR

Wamu asks to probe Fed over collapse — Reuters

Wherein the WSJ describes interest-rate expectations as “an epic fail” — WSJ

“The Intersection of Christianity and Journalism” would seem to be the null set, judging by the number of posts here — Case in Point

Beware of AAA Road Service Scams — Weiss

Sicha guts Schudson — The Awl

It’s AT&T that’s the problem. Not the iPhone — Daring Fireball

Lehmann on Taibbi: Good stuff — The Awl


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

Prof. Cowen as “Bride of Kripkenstein”

Posted by Uncle_Billy | Report as abusive

To be fair to Kripke, he did explicitly state that WRPL was not supposed to be taken as an exposition of Wittgenstein.

Posted by circusricardo | Report as abusive