Comments on: When Winkelried left Goldman http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: free porn video http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/comment-page-1/#comment-54351 Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:17:25 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/#comment-54351 We invite you and your family to Beth Jacob, a diverse congregation that is caring, inclusive and committed to Jewish Tradition and Am Yisrael. To learn more about our many programs and services, peruse this website, or even better, stop by in person! Telephone: 310-278-1911 or email: info@bethjacob.org.

]]>
By: traducere daneza http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/comment-page-1/#comment-53680 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:03:08 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/#comment-53680 My brother recommended I might like this web site. He was entirely right. This post actually made my day. You cann’t imagine just how much time I had spent for this info! Thanks!

]]>
By: johnhhaskell http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/comment-page-1/#comment-11602 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:17:19 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/#comment-11602 Felix-
It’s cute that you bought the cover story.

Winkelreid blew himself up and was forced out.

]]>
By: Gaw http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/comment-page-1/#comment-11595 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:53:51 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/#comment-11595 I bet they were relieved to get rid of him at that salary. Quite a bit more to go around.

]]>
By: msobel http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/comment-page-1/#comment-11584 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:48:03 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/#comment-11584 If you want loyalty, have your assistant lease a dog.

]]>
By: Philon http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/comment-page-1/#comment-11583 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:36:59 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/#comment-11583 “Loyalty to the firm”? What utter nonsense! A corporation is not a person; it has no feelings or other psychic attributes. It is not the sort of entity that is properly either the subject or the object of loyalty.

“Winkelried got paid $53.4 million in 2006, and $67.5 million in 2007. That should have bought a bit more loyalty than this . . . .” What that bought was two years’ worth of work. Winkelried delivered his side of the bargain; he owed nothing more.

]]>
By: scott1959 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/comment-page-1/#comment-11581 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:31:39 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/#comment-11581 He may not have shown a lot of loyalty to the firm, but do you really think the firm would show a lot of loyalty to him? In the end, I doubt it. Not in this day and age. So I am not sure why loyalty is even mentioned here.

]]>
By: RIckWebb http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/comment-page-1/#comment-11580 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:13:44 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/28/when-winkelried-left-goldman/#comment-11580 I’m sure he had a further horizon to look past than just the stock price on that day, though. He probably had pretty intimate knowledge of everything we now know – that profits were back, that their trading operations were going gangbusters, and that they’d come out ahead. Time has proven him correct. And he stayed long enough to make sure the company was safe. Where’s the disloyalty?

]]>