Moe Tkacik in The Baffler

By Felix Salmon
February 6, 2010
Moe Tkacik's monster essay reviewing most of the foremost recent crisis books. It's 8,000 words long, but it's worth it: Moe put a lot of effort and feeling into this piece, and it shows. For instance, here she is on Gillian Tett, and her glorification of the people who invented the synthetic collateralized debt obligation:

" data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

If you’re snowed in this weekend, I can highly recommend Moe Tkacik’s monster essay reviewing most of the foremost recent crisis books. It’s 8,000 words long, but it’s worth it: Moe put a lot of effort and feeling into this piece, and it shows. For instance, here she is on Gillian Tett, and her glorification of the people who invented the synthetic collateralized debt obligation:

Not content with her own seventy-odd uses of the word “innovation” and its variations over the course of 253 pages, Tett herself likens the team’s invention to “splitting the atom,” “cracking the DNA code”, “the banking equivalent of space travel” and the “financial equivalent of the Holy Grail.” Blythe Masters, a posh 25-yearold who would over the next few months take credit for inventing the credit default swap, would rave later that the concoction of sophisticated new “products” appealed to her not only because of her quantitative background, “but they are also so creative.” And finally: “I’ve known people who worked for the Manhattan Project, and for those of us on that trip there was that same kind of feeling at being present at the creation.”

And here she is on Neel Kashkari:

Former deputy Treasury Secretary Neel Kashkari, when in high school, filled most of his senior yearbook page with a large photo of a Ferrari, superimposing a picture of himself and assorted heavy metal lyrics. Recognition of the disaster’s potential magnitude did not convert to concern, however; according to David Wessel’s book, In Fed We Trust, in early 2008 Kashkari jestingly likened it to the Iran hostage crisis that consumed the 1980 election year, advising colleagues that mortgages, like hostages, were a problem for the “next president.” (A slightly different account in Too Big To Fail has Kashkari reversing this stance, urging Paulson to start lobbying to use federal funds to bail out the mortgage market lest the history books accord Obama all the credit for “bringing home the hostages.” I’m not sure which story makes Kashkari look like a bigger douchebag.)

Tkacik’s review comes from The Baffler, a truly wonderful magazine which you should find and buy; the current issue’s trenchantly leftist take on the financial crisis provides a refreshingly fresh perspective on a subject which can too easily feel very tired. And it has 5,300 words on Thomas Kinkade, too! What’s not to love?

More From Felix Salmon
Post Felix
The Piketty pessimist
The most expensive lottery ticket in the world
The problems of HFT, Joe Stiglitz edition
Private equity math, Nuveen edition
Five explanations for Greece’s bond yield
Comments
2 comments so far

A “trenchantly leftist” perspective on the crisis is “refreshingly fresh”? That take has been a main ingredient in much of the reportage that’s out there right now, and I’m not just talking about the blogosphere.

Posted by Mega | Report as abusive

why not rewrite that to read’”refreshingly entrenched ultra-leftist thinking repackaged to reflect the current course of the mindset of washington”.an elitist is an elitist is an elitist.

Posted by highmountainhot | Report as abusive
Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/