Comments on: The marriage of Figaro and paywalls http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/02/12/the-marriage-of-figaro-and-paywalls/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: HBC http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/02/12/the-marriage-of-figaro-and-paywalls/comment-page-1/#comment-11981 Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:40:18 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=2577#comment-11981 In whose book does paying money for something behind a wall make the heart grow fonder?

]]>
By: polit2k http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/02/12/the-marriage-of-figaro-and-paywalls/comment-page-1/#comment-11976 Sat, 13 Feb 2010 01:07:09 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=2577#comment-11976 More about Le Figaro: http://www.mondaynote.com/2009/09/20/a-c ase-study-le-figaros-advertising-gamble/

]]>
By: dlr http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/02/12/the-marriage-of-figaro-and-paywalls/comment-page-1/#comment-11974 Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:45:07 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=2577#comment-11974 What idiots. OLD news should be free. Fresh news should cost. They obviously don’t understand their basic business model.

]]>
By: Uncle_Billy http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/02/12/the-marriage-of-figaro-and-paywalls/comment-page-1/#comment-11972 Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:37:32 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=2577#comment-11972 A quibble: There is a marriage, a Figaro, and a paywall, but I went back over the plot of Marriage of Figaro and was unable to find a touchstone. Empty play on words???

]]>
By: absinthe http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/02/12/the-marriage-of-figaro-and-paywalls/comment-page-1/#comment-11971 Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:32:44 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=2577#comment-11971 Not sure I understand why they have limits on archive access even at the highest tier. Any idea how ‘old’ news has to be to end up there?

]]>