Comments on: Simmons leaves Goldman’s board

By: SelenesMom

SelenesMom — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:51:41 +0000

So without Simmons, Goldman wouldn’t have much in the way of “programs to help women and minorities”? I can’t imagine the women and people of minority heritage who actually work at Goldman appreciate the clumsy implication that whatever success they have had must be due to someone else’s “help.” Or are these programs in the community? In that case, why does she need to be a current board member of Goldman to support them?

By: MarkC123

MarkC123 — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 06:14:03 +0000

Felix Salmon: The most influential financial blogger… at Goldman Sachs?

By: kthomas

kthomas — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:36:32 +0000

The least she can do is thank the US Taxpayer. Good riddance, Madame. May the wind be ever in your face.

By: HBC

HBC — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 01:41:42 +0000

A disappointing thing about this article is how it presumes that, in the wake of real changes worth making, any part of Goldman Sachs should remain standing.

By: OnTheTimes

OnTheTimes — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:37:50 +0000

You must be a politician, setting the bar so low.

By: absinthe

absinthe — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:50:06 +0000

Congress, eh? I was going to ask him to get that creepy clerk at the CVS near me fired; no way that guy’s in the shareholders’ best interests.

By: OnTheTimes

OnTheTimes — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:11:50 +0000

First Ben Stein, now this woman. Can you start next on all of Congress?