<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Wolff&#8217;s doomed aggregation strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/04/05/michael-wolffs-doomed-aggregation-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/04/05/michael-wolffs-doomed-aggregation-strategy/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:36:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newserdotcom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/04/05/michael-wolffs-doomed-aggregation-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-13282</link>
		<dc:creator>Newserdotcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=3216#comment-13282</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m the Marketing Manager at Newser and I wanted to point out that we do, in fact, have inline links to the original source in addition to the link at the right (under SOURCES in red) and the link in the rollover (which you can access from the grid). Any omission of an inline link is simply an error, not an attempt to pass the source&#039;s content as our own. As a side note, we did remove interstitial ads (unrelated to Ms. Waxman&#039;s complaints).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m the Marketing Manager at Newser and I wanted to point out that we do, in fact, have inline links to the original source in addition to the link at the right (under SOURCES in red) and the link in the rollover (which you can access from the grid). Any omission of an inline link is simply an error, not an attempt to pass the source&#8217;s content as our own. As a side note, we did remove interstitial ads (unrelated to Ms. Waxman&#8217;s complaints).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j657</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/04/05/michael-wolffs-doomed-aggregation-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-13142</link>
		<dc:creator>j657</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 22:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=3216#comment-13142</guid>
		<description>&quot;Of course Newser is a bunch of free-riders... quite clearly wants Newser’s readers to stay on his own site, rather than go anywhere else.&quot;

It amazes me to find sites pulling that one - yet still trying to take themselves seriously as &#039;news outlets&#039; - as if people don&#039;t see what they&#039;re doing.   

(More strategies that annoy others, and are ultimately self-defeating: cloying/syncophantic fluff, and sh*tty writing.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Of course Newser is a bunch of free-riders&#8230; quite clearly wants Newser’s readers to stay on his own site, rather than go anywhere else.&#8221;</p>
<p>It amazes me to find sites pulling that one &#8211; yet still trying to take themselves seriously as &#8216;news outlets&#8217; &#8211; as if people don&#8217;t see what they&#8217;re doing.   </p>
<p>(More strategies that annoy others, and are ultimately self-defeating: cloying/syncophantic fluff, and sh*tty writing.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
