Opinion

Felix Salmon

Larry Summers and the revolving door

By Felix Salmon
April 6, 2010

Joshua Green has a virtuoso piece of Kremlinology at the Atlantic today, concluding, as his headline puts it, that “Yes, Larry Summers is Leaving.” But if it’s true, where is he leaving to?

Fed chairman is out of the question, and contra the periodic blogger hyperbole, Geithner seems ever more secure at Treasury. A university presidency isn’t going to happen. So a return to Harvard, Wall Street consulting and an FT column might be the likeliest option.

My feeling is that Harvard is likely, but the FT column is less so: it always seemed to me like a long-form job application aimed at whomever was going to win the Democratic nomination.

And “Wall Street consulting” is probably a polite way of saying “a return to DE Shaw”, which happily paid Larry $5 million for one year of one-day-a-week work, and would surely cough up much more if he gave them the opportunity and a greater time commitment. But there will be other bidders, too: John Paulson, fresh off of signing up Alan Greenspan, would surely be happy to pay millions to sit him down opposite Summers and see the two debate.

The Summers exit could well be the most lucrative use of the revolving door yet seen in the short history of the Obama administration: if he was willing to work full time, Summers could command significantly more than the $10 million a year Citigroup paid Bob Rubin when Rubin left Treasury.

As a result, Obama and his chief of staff are going to have to be very careful about exactly how they manage any Summers exit. If the announcement is made before the midterms, as Green suggests it should be, then they’re going to have to make sure than any subsequent announcements about where Summers is going are delayed until after them. Otherwise it’s going to be the easiest thing in the world for the Republicans to paint the Obama administration as the party of Wall Street fat cats.

Comments
3 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

But the Obama administration does appear to the party of Wall Street fat cats, so delaying the “where Summers is going” messaging will allow much more extravagant hyperbole from the Republicans. Right? Shouldn’t they fire him for incompetence or is this not possible?

Posted by nicfulton | Report as abusive
 

Letting Summers go, fast, and without regard for his next destination is the very best insurance against anyone accusing the Obama administration of catering to Wal*Street.

On the one hand, that accusation has never seemed to bother the Obama administration before. On the other, Summers is so tainted not to mention work-shy as to be no longer Too Big To Fire, not even in the eyes of his most sycophantic former admirers. Pity help his next employer, is all.

Posted by HBC | Report as abusive
 

Really hard hitting, Felix. You’re so… Mavricky.

Posted by RodolfoP | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •