Questions answered on business blogging

By Felix Salmon
April 13, 2010

I got an email this morning from a journalism student with a few questions; I thought if I was answering them I might as well do so on the blog, for anybody else interested.

1) How and why were business bloggers able to gain so much respect in the business world that companies are now inviting some bloggers to press conferences?

This one, I have to admit, made me laugh. Companies will invite pretty much anyone to press conferences: you don’t need to be respected. One difference between bloggers and journalists is that bloggers actually want to go to press conferences, and are flattered to be noticed and invited. As a result, they’re much more likely to write about them than journalists are. So inviting bloggers to press conferences is a good idea for all concerned. Remember that press conferences aren’t meant to be private, exclusive affairs: they’re designed to get information out to as many people as possible.

2) In your opinion, why do you believe that some bloggers are able to gain a big following despite the fact the blogger may have no formal training in journalism?

As someone with no formal training in journalism myself, I don’t know whether j-school trains people to develop a big following. I suspect, though, that it doesn’t. In my experience, j-school graduates tend to be quite earnest people who care a lot about the important role that journalism plays in a democracy while being less good at throwing caution to the wind and making mistakes. But as I like to say, if you’re never wrong, you’re never interesting. One of the best posts on this subject came from Gawker’s Gabriel Snyder, after Ian Shapira of WaPo accused Gawker’s Hamilton Nolan of stealing his story:

Hamilton succinctly digested Shapira’s piece and gave his post a headline (“‘Generational Consultant’ Holds America’s Fakest Job”) and lede (“The fakest job corporate America ever created was ‘Branding Consultant’ — until now”) that probably resembled what Shapira wanted to write but couldn’t.

All too often, I fear, a “formal training in journalism” just means that journalists self-censor the good and funny bits of stories that bloggers naturally latch on to. What’s more, bloggers have a much more natural voice and personality than journalists do. So it’s only natural that bloggers will get more of a “following” than some guy who writes straight-down-the-line stories for the local newspaper.

Then, of course, there’s the very germane fact that many highly successful bloggers didn’t get a formal training in journalism because they were too busy getting a formal training in the thing they’re writing about — business, finance, economics. The likes of Yves Smith or Brad DeLong or Simon Johnson or John Hempton are popular partly because these people know what they’re talking about and actually do it; it’s surely an advantage to be able to use first-hand rather than second-hand knowledge when you’re writing about something.

3) What does business blogging do to the future of mainstream business journalism outlets?

Well, in the best-case scenario, it makes them much better. Mainstream business journalists, if they’re smart, will read a lot of blogs and get a lot of insight from doing so; that’s going to make their journalism better. What’s more, blogs will drive lots of extra traffic to the best business journalists. Today, WaMu is all over the news; the best reporting on that story to date has come from the Puget Sound Business Journal. A few years ago, their story would barely have been noticed outside Washington State; now, anybody can read it, and people all over the country and the world do just that. (When it isn’t behind a firewall, of course.)

Journalists are often very competitive and feel that if anybody else is writing about what they’re writing about, that’s probably bad for them — especially if the rival outlet is very popular. But blogging doesn’t work like that: most of the time, when it’s done well, it’s full of external links, often to original journalism. Blogs are a great way for good journalism to get noticed, instead of being buried and ignored on page B7.

4) What does a business blog offer that is not offered by other media?

Attitude, links, wit, expertise, voice… all of these things exist in other media, but they come together in the blogosphere and are often absent elsewhere.

5) In your opinion, why did the U.S. Treasury in 2009 reach out and invite well-known economics bloggers to meet with Tim Geithner, the secretary of treasury?

Treasury spends a lot of time talking to reporters. Most of the discussions take place between hacks and flacks, but a lot take place between hacks and those famous Senior Treasury Officials, including Geithner. All of those officials are political appointees, so it should hardly come as a surprise that they cultivate relationships in the media. But of course the media is bigger now than it used to be, and even after the two blogger meetings at Treasury, I’m sure that the ratio of time-spent-on-bloggers to time-spent-on-journalists is much lower than the equivalent time-spent-reading ratio among media consumers. What’s more, bloggers tend to ask deeper questions, and spend less time on insidery political horse-race issues; officials who want to grapple with substantive issues often prefer talking to smart and sophisticated bloggers.

Overall, my feeling is that if mainstream business outlets embrace the blogosphere, they’ll do well. If they shun it, however — and paywalls are one good way to do that — then they’ll have a much harder time of things.

More From Felix Salmon
Post Felix
The Piketty pessimist
The most expensive lottery ticket in the world
The problems of HFT, Joe Stiglitz edition
Private equity math, Nuveen edition
Five explanations for Greece’s bond yield
Comments
10 comments so far

“many highly successful bloggers didn’t get a formal training in journalism because they were too busy getting a formal training in the thing they’re writing about . . .”

I strongly second that. I know you value reporting, and it serves an important purpose, but reporting is really low-hanging fruit. It’s the analysis that has much more value, and you get that by knowing something of which you write. Otherwise, you end up with those “political horse-race issues,” which don’t tell readers anything at all about the topic.

I’m surprised that you gave no mention to the reader community that surrounds successful bloggers. You get immediate feedback, corrections, enhancements, and so on. Traditional journalists tend to dislike feedback, and especially immediate feedback.

Posted by Curmudgeon | Report as abusive

“Overall, my feeling is that if mainstream business outlets embrace the blogosphere, they’ll do well. If they shun it, however — and paywalls are one good way to do that — then they’ll have a much harder time of things.”

Come on, Felix. Paywalls are reporters and journalism’s last chance for survival.
the free content and advertising business model has demonstrably failed.
i hope the nyt and rupert murdoch are successful in getting everyone to pay for their news.
some bloggers may have to adapt a bit; but hopefully the leech bloggers and pseudo news websites will be put out of business and reporters can make a living instead.
you don’t think reuters should be giving all their news content away on the web for free, i am sure.

Posted by alo | Report as abusive

Great post. As an aspiring journalist, one of my biggest concerns is simply not knowing enough about everything. Bloggers, like Felix says, often have very particular knowledge about their field that they couldn’t have gained had they been in J-school.

Still, It’s my hope that being a generalist will allow me to pull stories together and have a broader scope than someone with a more limited focus.

Man, I’m never getting a job.

Posted by ishmaeldaro | Report as abusive

Hi Felix. This is awesome. But um, you didn’t steal this exact story from that poor journalism student by posting your answers instead of replying privately, did you? Though I’m guessing you’d say that that’s not really a relevant point?

On another point – I like your emphasis on the fact that bloggers are experts, necessary expert voice. I wholeheartedly agree with that and am looking forward to the day when that’s just a given.

Posted by LauraRich | Report as abusive

I’m not sure if successful bloggers are experts. Or if they are more entertainment than information. I am sure my investment performance would improve if I spent more time reading filings and crunching numbers, and less time reading blogs and all the links I find there.

One important advantage successful bloggers seem to have is an ability to validate the bias of readers. Not that journalists don’t do that, just much more subtly.

Posted by wpw | Report as abusive

Laura —

How can I steal my own answers? Do you man that the journalism student no longer has exclusive access to those answers? Sure — but how is that stealing anything?

Posted by FelixSalmon | Report as abusive

Well, and I obviously have NO idea, but it wouldn’t be hard to imagine that he was sending around a survey of questions to a bunch of people, then was going to write up an analysis or reported piece based on the responses. And he could obviously still do that, though perhaps with a bit of wind taken out of the sails.

But it all brings up an interesting idea that the concept of “exclusive” could flip-flop from the sources to the journalist.

Posted by LauraRich | Report as abusive

I have no problem with what Felix did. Companies often will take their CEO’s responses to a reporter’s questions and post them online before the story runs.

The only way I think Felix would have been out of line would be if the student told him in the e-mail that he couldn’t post his responses.

The student was actually quite amused by the whole thing.


Chris Roush
Walter E. Hussman Sr. distinguished scholar in business journalism
Director, Carolina Business News Initiative
School of Journalism and Mass Communication
Campus Box 3365
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3365

Posted by ChrisRoush | Report as abusive

Do journalists actually do that though? Ask their sources not to post their own answers? I don’t think I’ve ever heard of anyone doing that.

I don’t think Felix was out of line necessarily, I just think it raises an interesting issue of this new dynamic – if a source publishes their responses first, how does that impact the final result?

Posted by LauraRich | Report as abusive

If the student was doing a survey, why wouldn’t he/she divulge that when sending the questions?

Even if your hypothetical scenario is true, it’s highly unlikely that a studenthas the same audience and exposure as this blog, so the final result is not impacted.

Lastly, to even do away with my final assumption, what kind of crazy person does an Internet search to see what other people have said before answering a survey?

Posted by vivhathaway | Report as abusive
Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/