The Bancrofts’ final WSJ capitulation

By Felix Salmon
May 28, 2010
the definitive account of the whole story, and now follows up with a couple of startling quotes from the Bancrofts who opposed the sale:

" data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

Remember the war over whether or not Rupert Murdoch would be able to buy the WSJ from the Bancroft family? Sarah Ellison has written the definitive account of the whole story, and now follows up with a couple of startling quotes from the Bancrofts who opposed the sale:

“I feel blessed it happened when it did,” Christopher Bancroft, a Bancroft heir and former Dow Jones director who campaigned against the deal with Murdoch, told me recently. “I’m glad I didn’t get my way.”…

Even Leslie Hill, a Dow Jones director who opposed the deal so passionately that she resigned her Dow Jones board seat in protest, says she doesn’t regret handing the company over to Murdoch. “Just look at how our family would have fared during the recession,” she told me recently.

It was always clear, of course, that Murdoch was offering the Bancrofts far more than their company was worth. But the family had long said that Dow Jones was not for sale, and before selling out they insisted on putting together safeguards to preserve the WSJ’s independence. Inevitably, those safeguards were ignored by Murdoch, and the paper has swung to the sensationalist right.

But rather than regret the sale to Murdoch, the Bancrofts who opposed the sale now are relieved that they lost. They thought that they were standing up for something more important than money — but now it turns out that money would have turned out to be more important after all. Glad that’s cleared up.

More From Felix Salmon
Post Felix
The Piketty pessimist
The most expensive lottery ticket in the world
The problems of HFT, Joe Stiglitz edition
Private equity math, Nuveen edition
Five explanations for Greece’s bond yield
2 comments so far

Yep, that is pretty much the only moral compass we have left in this country. Money. Nothing matters more.

Posted by gstern | Report as abusive

Long before Murdoch, the Bancrofts had handed editorial control to the despicable Robert Bartley, who was proudly to the right of Attila the Hun. The WSJ fight was never about “principles” since the family was disengaged from the paper. It was about the difference between being the owners of a famous property and merely being rich. Rich is better.

Posted by steamboatbill | Report as abusive
Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see