Why companies will stick with Twitter

By Felix Salmon
June 21, 2010

I was offline for much of Friday for various reasons, with the World Cup not even being the main one. Instead, I was across the street from Reuters, at the Nasdaq, sitting on one panel and giving a keynote speech to a group of financial PR professionals interested in social media in general, and Twitter in particular.

The main thrust of my speech was that if blogs started to blur the distinction between journalists and the public at large, then Twitter has made things even fuzzier: everybody (companies, executives, PRs, hacks, flacks, bloggers, individuals) is interacting on a very level playing field. And insofar as there are certain people on Twitter who are very influential, there’s a good chance that they’re not the journalists at large media outlets whom PR people have historically spent most of their time trying to cultivate.

What’s more, Twitter gives companies the ability to speak directly to the public without going via journalists (or even mere bloggers); and it also allows them to keep tab on what the public thinks without using journalists and media commentators as an imperfect proxy. Public relations is, after all, the art of relating with the public: journalists are just a means to an end. And the public has never been as easy to relate with as it is now, in the age of Twitter.

Which is why I think that Simon Dumenco is wrong. He’s convinced that corporate presence on Twitter is going to end up feeling much more like those toll-free customer service lines, sooner rather than later:

Social-media as a corporate meme is still pretty interesting and exciting and attractive… a lot of the smart, ambitious, college-educated, well-socialized people in corporate environments are getting sucked into social media. Some of these bright young folks can say things like, “Oh, I manage social media for X Corp.” or “I monitor social media for Y Industries” — and it sounds pretty cool. But what they’re really doing is slaving away at a virtual call center. (If Mom and Dad, who helped pay for college, really understood that, they’d weep.)

Which ain’t gonna last. Old-school customer-service phone lines tend to be staffed by not-so-helpful, not-particularly-well-educated, not-so-patient workers because, let’s be honest, talking to cranky, pissy customers is shit work. (Or the call center employees are well-educated, but non-native speakers of English squeezed into cubicles on another continent. Either way, they’re probably biding time.)

But the difference with Twitter is that it’s public. Every so often, some enterprising blogger will put a customer-service call online, to one company’s embarrassment and everybody else’s general merriment. But most of the time, companies can get away with shabby service because they can’t be seen behaving unhelpfully.

A company with a large number of Twitter followers, and which engages helpfully with its customers on Twitter, in full view of the world, is a company which is doing wonders for its reputation and which is well placed to be able to deal nimbly with any reputational problems that might arise. Whereas a company which doesn’t have that infrastructure in place is likely to end up like Eurostar. (Let’s not even get started on BP.)

More generally, Twitter is growing so fast that the executive ranks of most companies are increasingly full of people who use Twitter regularly. Just as corporate flacks try to get interviews with executives into the WSJ because that’s the paper the executives read, they’re also going to try to keep the company’s presence on Twitter high-profile and shiny because that’s something the executives are likely keeping a close eye on themselves.

So expect a lot more pressure, both top-down and bottom-up, on companies to embrace the Twittersphere. Meanwhile, the people being squeezed will be those in the middle, who have to actually implement the corporate response. If the delegates at the conference on Friday are any indication, they’re still a bit slow to engage. But they’ll get there soon. They have no choice.

More From Felix Salmon
Post Felix
The Piketty pessimist
The most expensive lottery ticket in the world
The problems of HFT, Joe Stiglitz edition
Private equity math, Nuveen edition
Five explanations for Greece’s bond yield
Comments
3 comments so far

Why NVG companies are sticking with Twitter in 2010:

- companies think it makes them look incredibly important, rip-roaringly successful and far too busy to read or write actual emails with big words
- clients who don’t mind being compared to birds are likely to be complacent, unfocused consumers
- you can’t be too critical in a Tweet or it would be called a “Croak”
- Tweets are [fingers crossed] inadmissible as evidence in court

Whereas by 2011 it shall be broadly recognized that:

- Tweeting doesn’t make you look busy, it makes you look stupid, semi-literate and ADD-afflicted
- customers who Tweet are in fact mentally feeble, therefore screwing them is statutory rape
- wait up: Steve Jobs’ deathbed legacy, in atonement for his sins with AT&T, the RIAA and DRM will be the iCroak – an instrument of popular revenge on venal corporatists everywhere, eats Tweets for breakfast… and it’s free!
- increasingly, court cases will be settled by apps; Tweets containing >1 smiley/frowny punctuation item become punishable by law…ZZAAP!!!!

Bring on the future, say I.

Posted by HBC | Report as abusive

I don’t think it’s an either/or proposition, but rather an also/and… some companies may find that their customers are best engaged by this sort of media, while other (bigger) companies will use it as they do the automated directory. I don’t think it belies sophistication or any such thing… but I DO find that twitter comes with it’s enormous share of spam and crap, so I’d tend to stay away from it as a main portal for engaging clients/customers.

Posted by CDNrebel | Report as abusive

Twitter has very low recall value. Companies will need to constantly update and will need to be interesting.

http://www.digitalpost.org/2010/06/seo-g uide-to-twitter-user-psychology.html

Posted by lchowdhary | Report as abusive
Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/