The indignities of an investment banker in China

By Felix Salmon
June 22, 2010
Michael Flaherty's story about the indignities facing the poor bankers working on the AgBank IPO in China: the data room is underground! And they might have to miss World Cup matches!

" data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

Whenever the subject of banker pay comes up, there’s always an apologist somewhere talking about how very hard these people work — nights, weekends, everything!

Which is why I had a good giggle this morning on reading Michael Flaherty’s story about the indignities facing the poor bankers working on the AgBank IPO in China: the data room is underground! And they might have to miss World Cup matches!

The AgBank deal is coming to a head just as investment bankers are used to taking time off for summer — or to watch the soccer World Cup. If they thought the workflow in Beijing may slow a bit in the last few weeks, they were mistaken.

Members of the Hong Kong underwriting group grumbled when they were summoned for a meeting in Beijing at 9.00 p.m. on a recent Friday.

Some AgBank executives have a habit of sending ideas to the core e-mail group very late at night, one of the sources said.

Worst of all, the banks have no idea how many millions they’ll be paid for their work:

While, for some, the prestige of being involved in what is likely to be a record IPO outweighs the pain of the tightly controlled process, the bankers still don’t know how much they’ll be paid.

Sources say the seven banks involved in the Hong Kong offering expect a fee of around 3 percent. If AgBank raises $12 billion for the H-share IPO, that would mean a fee pool of $360 million — an average of around $50 million each, though it’s unlikely each bank would be paid the same.

Doesn’t your heart just bleed.

3 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

“The ketamine was terrible, and the lines were too small…”

Posted by HBC | Report as abusive

I am clearly an apologist but doesn’t this prove they work hard (at least now and again)?

No one says they aren’t allowed to whinge about it, just like everyone else does.
Just because you get paid to work hard, it doesn’t mean you have to like it…

Also, the $50m each is a totally irrelevant number to highlight.
It bears no relation to any individual’s pay.

Posted by TinyTim1 | Report as abusive

The error is that there are some “investment bankers” who get a lot of money and glory and do not post about themselves all over the place, although they are not immune to bragging. They are relatively few in number, although visible. Let’s say they are Erin Callan pre-fall and on up. There is also a huge army of “investment bankers” consisting of most of us, our friends from school, second-year associates, some analysts, and the whiners we don’t want to be associated with. This group is the leverage that funnels value-add up to those who really make the bucks, when it all works, which is not always.

Posted by SelenesMom | Report as abusive