The new wave of bank taxes

By Felix Salmon
June 22, 2010
one-off supertax on bankers' bonuses to a much more permanent -- and indeed rising -- tax on bank balance sheets:

" data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

Maybe this was inevitable: the UK has moved from its clever one-off supertax on bankers’ bonuses to a much more permanent — and indeed rising — tax on bank balance sheets:

The government said on Tuesday it proposed to introduce a 0.07 percent levy on banks’ balance sheets, rising from an initial 0.04 percent tax to be applied from January 1, 2011.

Chancellor George Osborne announced the tax in his first budget on Tuesday. The levy, which will apply to UK banks and building societies and UK units of foreign banks, is expected to raise more than 2 billion pounds ($3.09 billion) per year.

The UK is in a fiscal crunch, and it needs to raise money anywhere it can, so this makes sense. The nation as a whole is deeply in debt, and rising taxes on all sectors of the economy are a way of enforcing savings to prevent that debt from spiraling out of control.

I would have liked, however, to see the tax be a little less flat. If the Fiscal Commission is looking across the pond to see what the UK is doing, then I’d urge them to think a bit more inventively: make the tax progressive, with too-big-to-fail banks paying a higher rate; and maybe link it to leverage, somehow, as well.

I do think it would be silly for UK banks to start thinking about how they might be able to relocate to get around this tax. The UK might be the first, but in these fiscal times this kind of thing will become very common all over the world.

Update: Peston goes down the list of losers and (relative) winners.

Update 2: GingerYellow says that looking at the details, the UK bank tax is actually quite close to what I’m looking for.

Comments
One comment so far

“I would have liked, however, to see the tax be a little less flat. If the Fiscal Commission is looking across the pond to see what the UK is doing, then I’d urge them to think a bit more inventively: make the tax progressive, with too-big-to-fail banks paying a higher rate; and maybe link it to leverage, somehow, as well.”

It only applies to too big to fail banks – ie those with liabilities over £20bn. And it is linked to leverage. Deposits and tier one capital are deducted from the measured liabilities. Moreover, it’s linked to liquidity – banks pay a lower rate for long term liabilities (defined as maturing in at least a year, which doesn’t seem all that long term to me, but it’s better than repo funding I guess). It’s certainly less flat than the Obama administration’s similar proposal.

Posted by GingerYellow | Report as abusive
Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/