<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new wave of bank taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/06/22/the-new-wave-of-bank-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/06/22/the-new-wave-of-bank-taxes/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:40:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GingerYellow</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/06/22/the-new-wave-of-bank-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-16084</link>
		<dc:creator>GingerYellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4372#comment-16084</guid>
		<description>&quot;I would have liked, however, to see the tax be a little less flat. If the Fiscal Commission is looking across the pond to see what the UK is doing, then I’d urge them to think a bit more inventively: make the tax progressive, with too-big-to-fail banks paying a higher rate; and maybe link it to leverage, somehow, as well.&quot;

It only applies to too big to fail banks - ie those with liabilities over £20bn. And it is linked to leverage. Deposits and tier one capital are deducted from the measured liabilities. Moreover, it&#039;s linked to liquidity - banks pay a lower rate for long term liabilities (defined as maturing in at least a year, which doesn&#039;t seem all that long term to me, but it&#039;s better than repo funding I guess). It&#039;s certainly less flat than the Obama administration&#039;s similar proposal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I would have liked, however, to see the tax be a little less flat. If the Fiscal Commission is looking across the pond to see what the UK is doing, then I’d urge them to think a bit more inventively: make the tax progressive, with too-big-to-fail banks paying a higher rate; and maybe link it to leverage, somehow, as well.&#8221;</p>
<p>It only applies to too big to fail banks &#8211; ie those with liabilities over £20bn. And it is linked to leverage. Deposits and tier one capital are deducted from the measured liabilities. Moreover, it&#8217;s linked to liquidity &#8211; banks pay a lower rate for long term liabilities (defined as maturing in at least a year, which doesn&#8217;t seem all that long term to me, but it&#8217;s better than repo funding I guess). It&#8217;s certainly less flat than the Obama administration&#8217;s similar proposal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
