<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dow yields more than 10-year Treasuries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/07/01/the-dow-yields-more-than-10-year-treasuries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/07/01/the-dow-yields-more-than-10-year-treasuries/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckbryant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/07/01/the-dow-yields-more-than-10-year-treasuries/comment-page-1/#comment-16338</link>
		<dc:creator>ckbryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4522#comment-16338</guid>
		<description>If you like the dividend yield now, just wait six months.  It&#039;s about to become _awesome_.  Or at least that&#039;s my bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you like the dividend yield now, just wait six months.  It&#8217;s about to become _awesome_.  Or at least that&#8217;s my bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrEvil</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/07/01/the-dow-yields-more-than-10-year-treasuries/comment-page-1/#comment-16333</link>
		<dc:creator>DrEvil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4522#comment-16333</guid>
		<description>So what, tell it to the Japanese!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what, tell it to the Japanese!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BahM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/07/01/the-dow-yields-more-than-10-year-treasuries/comment-page-1/#comment-16332</link>
		<dc:creator>BahM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4522#comment-16332</guid>
		<description>There is more to stock return than dividend yield. How about total return? Considering return while excluding risk does not help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is more to stock return than dividend yield. How about total return? Considering return while excluding risk does not help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MRLAMF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/07/01/the-dow-yields-more-than-10-year-treasuries/comment-page-1/#comment-16330</link>
		<dc:creator>MRLAMF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4522#comment-16330</guid>
		<description>Depends on what you are discounting. Finance 101=WACC.  Using both your methods would yield terrible results. Garbage In Garbage Out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends on what you are discounting. Finance 101=WACC.  Using both your methods would yield terrible results. Garbage In Garbage Out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/07/01/the-dow-yields-more-than-10-year-treasuries/comment-page-1/#comment-16326</link>
		<dc:creator>KJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4522#comment-16326</guid>
		<description>risk free rates maybe heading lower but risky blended rates are not, it is the latter you should use for dcf. that said, i agree it&#039;s got serious limitations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>risk free rates maybe heading lower but risky blended rates are not, it is the latter you should use for dcf. that said, i agree it&#8217;s got serious limitations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
