<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FT Alphaville&#8217;s predictive powers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/07/22/ft-alphavilles-predictive-powers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/07/22/ft-alphavilles-predictive-powers/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregHao</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/07/22/ft-alphavilles-predictive-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-17007</link>
		<dc:creator>GregHao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4837#comment-17007</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amusing how different people behave differently, I actually subscribe to the dead tree version of the FT and am happy paying for it while I get my FT online access through my work and if they didn&#039;t pay for it I doubt that I would do it out of my own pockets.

Also, maybe this is some more confusion on my part but Paul &amp; Stacy will not be a part of the FT Tilt project and have left FT altogether?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amusing how different people behave differently, I actually subscribe to the dead tree version of the FT and am happy paying for it while I get my FT online access through my work and if they didn&#8217;t pay for it I doubt that I would do it out of my own pockets.</p>
<p>Also, maybe this is some more confusion on my part but Paul &amp; Stacy will not be a part of the FT Tilt project and have left FT altogether?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FelixSalmon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/07/22/ft-alphavilles-predictive-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-17002</link>
		<dc:creator>FelixSalmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4837#comment-17002</guid>
		<description>Yes, Paul has left Alphaville, along with Stacy. But no, I&#039;m not at all sure that Alphaville is now headed for paywall obscurity. I sincerely hope it isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Paul has left Alphaville, along with Stacy. But no, I&#8217;m not at all sure that Alphaville is now headed for paywall obscurity. I sincerely hope it isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigBadBank</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/07/22/ft-alphavilles-predictive-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-16995</link>
		<dc:creator>BigBadBank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4837#comment-16995</guid>
		<description>Felix - Do you actually have any evidence that Paul Murphy is leaving Alphaville other than the pre-existence of something called FT Tilt? And are you sure that Alphaville is heading for paywall obscurity? Stacy Marie Ishmael has assured me that this is not the case, although I must admit that I was not completely convinced.

Personally I don&#039;t see the problem with paying for online newspapers - I&#039;m a subscriber to FT.com and it is cheaper and more useful than buying the wooden version every day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Felix &#8211; Do you actually have any evidence that Paul Murphy is leaving Alphaville other than the pre-existence of something called FT Tilt? And are you sure that Alphaville is heading for paywall obscurity? Stacy Marie Ishmael has assured me that this is not the case, although I must admit that I was not completely convinced.</p>
<p>Personally I don&#8217;t see the problem with paying for online newspapers &#8211; I&#8217;m a subscriber to FT.com and it is cheaper and more useful than buying the wooden version every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregHao</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/07/22/ft-alphavilles-predictive-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-16981</link>
		<dc:creator>GregHao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4837#comment-16981</guid>
		<description>Felix, it is indeed incredibly disappointing (and annoying), how FT seems to grasp onto his PayWall/truncate policies.  However, for you and your other readers who might use Google Reader, the excellent google reader full feed chrome extension (https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/ngjdkiihbphbiaeaaghhlacjnoekdcfe) allows one to read FT Alphaville within google reader.  Of course, that&#039;ll probably be non-functional once Alphaville goes behind the paywall as you seem to semi imply with the departure of Paul Murphy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Felix, it is indeed incredibly disappointing (and annoying), how FT seems to grasp onto his PayWall/truncate policies.  However, for you and your other readers who might use Google Reader, the excellent google reader full feed chrome extension (https://chrome.google.com/extensions/de tail/ngjdkiihbphbiaeaaghhlacjnoekdcfe) allows one to read FT Alphaville within google reader.  Of course, that&#8217;ll probably be non-functional once Alphaville goes behind the paywall as you seem to semi imply with the departure of Paul Murphy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
