<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The huge obstacles facing Murdoch&#8217;s new tablet newspaper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/08/13/the-huge-obstacles-facing-murdochs-new-tablet-newspaper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/08/13/the-huge-obstacles-facing-murdochs-new-tablet-newspaper/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:43:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muttah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/08/13/the-huge-obstacles-facing-murdochs-new-tablet-newspaper/comment-page-1/#comment-17296</link>
		<dc:creator>Muttah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4936#comment-17296</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s an ideology born by an old technology, when the fogeys die off Murdoch&#039;s Newsltd will disappear into the desert dusts of South Australia from whence it came. Right wing claptrap is not premium content. Every right wingnut and global warming denialist has their own blog now, and some are subsidised by big oil, why should I pay for something from Murdoch given so freely away by others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s an ideology born by an old technology, when the fogeys die off Murdoch&#8217;s Newsltd will disappear into the desert dusts of South Australia from whence it came. Right wing claptrap is not premium content. Every right wingnut and global warming denialist has their own blog now, and some are subsidised by big oil, why should I pay for something from Murdoch given so freely away by others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hansrudolf</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/08/13/the-huge-obstacles-facing-murdochs-new-tablet-newspaper/comment-page-1/#comment-17269</link>
		<dc:creator>hansrudolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4936#comment-17269</guid>
		<description>Old Murdoch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old Murdoch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDN_finance</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/08/13/the-huge-obstacles-facing-murdochs-new-tablet-newspaper/comment-page-1/#comment-17264</link>
		<dc:creator>CDN_finance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4936#comment-17264</guid>
		<description>I think Mr Murdoch has misjudged the iPad audience - they&#039;re not big on his type of sensationalist right-wing claptrap (FOXNews is a joke, WSJ has gone to hell since he took over)... I can&#039;t expect this to be any kind of success even if it were free.

Might want to add that CNN and CNBC (leftwing equivalents?) wouldn&#039;t any more popular amongst the average iPad user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Mr Murdoch has misjudged the iPad audience &#8211; they&#8217;re not big on his type of sensationalist right-wing claptrap (FOXNews is a joke, WSJ has gone to hell since he took over)&#8230; I can&#8217;t expect this to be any kind of success even if it were free.</p>
<p>Might want to add that CNN and CNBC (leftwing equivalents?) wouldn&#8217;t any more popular amongst the average iPad user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/08/13/the-huge-obstacles-facing-murdochs-new-tablet-newspaper/comment-page-1/#comment-17261</link>
		<dc:creator>Curmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4936#comment-17261</guid>
		<description>Could it be that Murdoch and other publishers haven&#039;t yet realized that reading has changed?  Rather than read a single periodical most or all of the way through, we follow a story thread through links between publications.  Have publishers not yet groked that, or are they bound and determined to keep their traditional business model intact?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be that Murdoch and other publishers haven&#8217;t yet realized that reading has changed?  Rather than read a single periodical most or all of the way through, we follow a story thread through links between publications.  Have publishers not yet groked that, or are they bound and determined to keep their traditional business model intact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david3</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/08/13/the-huge-obstacles-facing-murdochs-new-tablet-newspaper/comment-page-1/#comment-17260</link>
		<dc:creator>david3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=4936#comment-17260</guid>
		<description>I have an iPad... Why would I pay for this when I have Flipboard and Pulse? Even the USA Today, NPR and Bloomberg apps I have are free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an iPad&#8230; Why would I pay for this when I have Flipboard and Pulse? Even the USA Today, NPR and Bloomberg apps I have are free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
