Insider trading datapoint of the day

By Felix Salmon
August 25, 2010
seems to be true:

" data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

It’s barely credible, but it seems to be true:

On August 12,13, and 16, 2010, Defendant Juan Jose Fernandez Garcia (“Garcia”), a Madrid, Spain resident and the Head of European Equity Derivatives at Banco Santander, S.A., an advisor to BHP in connection with its tender offer, purchased a total of 282 call options for approximately $13,669, all of which he sold on August 17, 2010 for a profit of approximately $576,000.

That’s a 4,000% profit in the space of three business days. What on earth did he think he was doing? It’s all pretty obvious stuff: on August 12, for instance, Garcia bought 32 call options on POT with a strike of $130 and which were going to expire on August 21. On that day, POT was trading between $106.56 and $112.88 per share, and the call options cost him the grand sum of 2 cents apiece.

When POT opened on August 17 at $143.11 per share, Garcia sold his options. I’m not sure what the price was on the $130 calls, but it was probably somewhere in the region of $13 each. A nice return.

Santander has yet to comment on this case, but it’s crazy that a senior member of their equity-derivatives team would engage in something as obvious as this, using his own personal account in his own name. I suspect there’s another shoe to drop here. But there’s no doubt that this is a massive egg on Santander’s face, not least because the Chinese walls there clearly failed in the worse possible way. I’ll be fascinated to see how this case plays out: I’m quite sure there’s a very juicy story behind the scenes somewhere.

One comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

Um, gosh. The SEC complaint is dated Aug. 20, so that qualifies as quick work.

Posted by MattF | Report as abusive