<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s a bad idea to regulate the art market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/09/07/its-a-bad-idea-to-regulate-the-art-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/09/07/its-a-bad-idea-to-regulate-the-art-market/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MariaIris27</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/09/07/its-a-bad-idea-to-regulate-the-art-market/comment-page-1/#comment-18360</link>
		<dc:creator>MariaIris27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=5233#comment-18360</guid>
		<description>This is the first I&#039;ve heard about these regulations. Honestly turning the tradition of buying and selling into a financially regulated market is ludicrous. How can a fund decide what a work of art is worth? A painting? a sculpture? If it wasn&#039;t for the beauty, singularity and enjoyment of art it would be worth exactly the materials used to create it. I couldn&#039;t word your argument better, &quot;You can&#039;t be ripped off if you&#039;re paying for your own subjective enjoyment of artwork.&quot;
People don&#039;t buy extremely expensive art to make a profit. If they are trying to then that is stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the first I&#8217;ve heard about these regulations. Honestly turning the tradition of buying and selling into a financially regulated market is ludicrous. How can a fund decide what a work of art is worth? A painting? a sculpture? If it wasn&#8217;t for the beauty, singularity and enjoyment of art it would be worth exactly the materials used to create it. I couldn&#8217;t word your argument better, &#8220;You can&#8217;t be ripped off if you&#8217;re paying for your own subjective enjoyment of artwork.&#8221;<br />
People don&#8217;t buy extremely expensive art to make a profit. If they are trying to then that is stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stella1Star</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/09/07/its-a-bad-idea-to-regulate-the-art-market/comment-page-1/#comment-18107</link>
		<dc:creator>Stella1Star</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=5233#comment-18107</guid>
		<description>Agreed, and the same goes for antiques.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, and the same goes for antiques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
