Comments on: The WSJ’s Goldman non-story http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/09/23/the-wsjs-goldman-non-story/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: johnhhaskell http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/09/23/the-wsjs-goldman-non-story/comment-page-1/#comment-18769 Sat, 25 Sep 2010 08:08:40 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=5478#comment-18769 David Mamet is posting on this blog?! Awesome!

]]>
By: FelixSalmon http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/09/23/the-wsjs-goldman-non-story/comment-page-1/#comment-18766 Sat, 25 Sep 2010 05:09:16 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=5478#comment-18766 TinyOne, I’m happy to admit to mistakes where I make them. But I stand by that post. Nothing since it was written indicates to me that it was wrong.

]]>
By: TinyOne http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/09/23/the-wsjs-goldman-non-story/comment-page-1/#comment-18758 Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:55:46 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=5478#comment-18758 Felix, your “reporting” on Abacus was an embarrassment. I’ve never seen any retractions on your part for the numerous inaccuracies you propagated when the story broke… including the infamous David Mamet post. That post was a wholesale fabrication of the events which occurred and exposed you for having zero understanding of bespoke credit derivatives.

http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/20 10/04/19/would-a-goldman-disclosure-have -helped/

]]>