<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The car-loan interest rate lottery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/11/05/the-car-loan-interest-rate-lottery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/11/05/the-car-loan-interest-rate-lottery/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:51:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: j7uy5</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/11/05/the-car-loan-interest-rate-lottery/comment-page-1/#comment-20225</link>
		<dc:creator>j7uy5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=5999#comment-20225</guid>
		<description>Perhaps if you use NSCA Mosaic, you can get a negative interest rate.  For what it is worth, I used Lynx, a text-only browser, and got an offer for 3.1%.  It is not clear how that would figure into a risk-based model at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps if you use NSCA Mosaic, you can get a negative interest rate.  For what it is worth, I used Lynx, a text-only browser, and got an offer for 3.1%.  It is not clear how that would figure into a risk-based model at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c65hsk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/11/05/the-car-loan-interest-rate-lottery/comment-page-1/#comment-20209</link>
		<dc:creator>c65hsk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=5999#comment-20209</guid>
		<description>I find 0.3% to 0.6% lower values if I use Konqueror rather than Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find 0.3% to 0.6% lower values if I use Konqueror rather than Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: levinsontodd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/11/05/the-car-loan-interest-rate-lottery/comment-page-1/#comment-20205</link>
		<dc:creator>levinsontodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=5999#comment-20205</guid>
		<description>In the comments on the consumerist two people claim that which browser one uses is a variable in calculating your interest rate.

From the comments:
&quot;If you model the risk and revenue of applicants, the type of browser shows up as a significant variable. Browsers do predict an account&#039;s performance to some degree, and it will affect the rates you will view. It isn&#039;t a marketing test.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the comments on the consumerist two people claim that which browser one uses is a variable in calculating your interest rate.</p>
<p>From the comments:<br />
&#8220;If you model the risk and revenue of applicants, the type of browser shows up as a significant variable. Browsers do predict an account&#8217;s performance to some degree, and it will affect the rates you will view. It isn&#8217;t a marketing test.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foodist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/11/05/the-car-loan-interest-rate-lottery/comment-page-1/#comment-20193</link>
		<dc:creator>foodist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=5999#comment-20193</guid>
		<description>Here in England, I&#039;m getting the opposite.

Chrome gives me:

New Vehicle	3.50%	3.87%	4.97%
Used Vehicle (Dealer)	5.09%	5.39%	6.71%
Refinancing	4.84%	4.84%	4.84%

While IE gives me:

New Vehicle 2.70% 3.07% 3.87% 
Used Vehicle (Dealer) 4.09% 4.39% 5.51% 
Refinancing 3.94% 3.94% 3.94% 

Randomised or clever marketing gimmmick?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in England, I&#8217;m getting the opposite.</p>
<p>Chrome gives me:</p>
<p>New Vehicle	3.50%	3.87%	4.97%<br />
Used Vehicle (Dealer)	5.09%	5.39%	6.71%<br />
Refinancing	4.84%	4.84%	4.84%</p>
<p>While IE gives me:</p>
<p>New Vehicle 2.70% 3.07% 3.87%<br />
Used Vehicle (Dealer) 4.09% 4.39% 5.51%<br />
Refinancing 3.94% 3.94% 3.94% </p>
<p>Randomised or clever marketing gimmmick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
