<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bond-market demonization watch, eurozone edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/12/08/bond-market-demonization-watch-eurozone-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/12/08/bond-market-demonization-watch-eurozone-edition/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domination</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/12/08/bond-market-demonization-watch-eurozone-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-21766</link>
		<dc:creator>Domination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=6479#comment-21766</guid>
		<description>I saw the NYT reporter Joe Nocera on John Stewart&#039;s show were he criticised CDS. What was apparent was that he did not really understand what he was talking about. He was just getting angry - probably because he considers that anything he is too dumb to comprehend must by definition be &quot;evil&quot; rather than a statement on his IQ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the NYT reporter Joe Nocera on John Stewart&#8217;s show were he criticised CDS. What was apparent was that he did not really understand what he was talking about. He was just getting angry &#8211; probably because he considers that anything he is too dumb to comprehend must by definition be &#8220;evil&#8221; rather than a statement on his IQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gotthardbahn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/12/08/bond-market-demonization-watch-eurozone-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-21719</link>
		<dc:creator>Gotthardbahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=6479#comment-21719</guid>
		<description>I agree. Well done, Felix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Well done, Felix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottorock</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/12/08/bond-market-demonization-watch-eurozone-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-21708</link>
		<dc:creator>ottorock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=6479#comment-21708</guid>
		<description>At the risk of sounding way sycophantic, I agree with DanHess; A terrific post indeed. Cutting through the BS written about bonds and demystifying the subject is a thing you do superbly well, Salmon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of sounding way sycophantic, I agree with DanHess; A terrific post indeed. Cutting through the BS written about bonds and demystifying the subject is a thing you do superbly well, Salmon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanHess</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/12/08/bond-market-demonization-watch-eurozone-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-21704</link>
		<dc:creator>DanHess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=6479#comment-21704</guid>
		<description>Terrific post.  If the product wasn&#039;t bonds but something easier to understand like cars it would be obvious that demonizing buyers for not buying is just silly.

Imagine if the Times demonized the public for not buying Detroit cars in 2008.  Or blamed condo flippers for not keeping the housing bubble going in 2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific post.  If the product wasn&#8217;t bonds but something easier to understand like cars it would be obvious that demonizing buyers for not buying is just silly.</p>
<p>Imagine if the Times demonized the public for not buying Detroit cars in 2008.  Or blamed condo flippers for not keeping the housing bubble going in 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
