Housing: Ackman vs Shilling

By Felix Salmon
December 29, 2010
Bill Ackman and Gary Shilling in the wake of yesterday's dreadful home-price numbers.

" data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

It’s Housing Day over at Business Insider today, which is running duelling slideshows from Bill Ackman and Gary Shilling in the wake of yesterday’s dreadful home-price numbers. Both of them are a little dated—Ackman’s is from November 3, while Shilling’s seems to be from October, although it’s not entirely clear. Since then, prices have fallen, which would do little to change either of the analyses, but also interest rates have risen significantly, which puts a substantial dent in Ackman’s math.

Ackman’s logic is pretty simple: you can get a lot of leverage in the housing market, and if you make a highly-leveraged bet and prices rise, then you can get enormous returns. At the heart of his thesis is the idea that valuations are low and will rise in future—but to my eyes at least, there are problems with both legs of that argument.

The “valuation” section of the slideshow is a relatively small part of the whole. It says that home prices are 28% off their peak; that houses are more affordable now than they have been in a long time; and that buy-vs-rent calculations work out in favor of buying with relatively low home-price appreciation rates between 4% and 6%.

The first one seems meaningless to me: why should home prices be low at 28% off the peak, as opposed to say 18% off or 38% off? In fact, a glance at the Case Shiller graph shows that prices are still roughly double what they were for most of the 1990s.* And more generally, when the first part of a valuation argument is percentage-off-highs, I always get suspicious, because that’s always a really stupid metric on which to base a buying decision.

The affordability calculations, too, are a temporary phenomenon related to artificially low mortgage rates and the fact that the US government is currently providing substantially all housing finance. What I’m not seeing is any analysis by Ackman showing that houses will remain affordable in a future of higher rates and private-sector financing—the future when, I assume, he’s looking to exit his residential-property position.

Finally, required appreciation rates of 4% to 6% seem high to me, not low: they say to me that buying is still more expensive than renting unless you assume capital gains on your purchase. Ackman, here, comes close to assuming the very thing he’s trying to demonstrate.

As for the reasons for future gains in house prices, there’s a bit of basic demographics, in that the number of households in the US is going to rise over time, and is going to outpace the amount of new homebuilding. That’s reasonable.

Ackman’s other main argument is based on the assumption that homeownership is going to bottom out at 66% and stay there, rather than continuing on the long cyclical decline which started in 2004. If he’s wrong by just a single percentage point, a lot of his mathematics starts looking very shaky. I suspect that as America moves out of the suburbs and exurbs and into denser forms of living, we’ll see a steady decline in homeownership, which in any case is now seen as being more of a liability than an asset. It’s no longer a road to riches: it’s a road to possible foreclosure, bankruptcy, and an inability to move to where the employment opportunities might be.

Ackman is a speculator, and he’s forecasting a return of his speculative mindset among the population at large—where people buy homes because they’re confident in the future and think that those homes will rise in value, and also because they fear not being able to afford a house in future. That mindset fuels housing bubbles, not sustainable home-price appreciation. And investing in bubbles is always very dangerous, and generally ends in tears. Maybe Ackman can make money doing it—but that certainly doesn’t mean that homes are a good buy right now for the rest of us.

Ackman does have one intriguing idea about what might drive house-price appreciation: institutional investment in single-family home rental properties. He’s right that such things barely exist as a financial asset class, and that even a small global allocation to them could change the demand dynamics substantially. But being a landlord is hard work, especially in suburban and exurban neighborhoods, and I’m not convinced that it scales well: my guess is that the cost of hiring a good rental agent is always going to wipe out returns, and that the only way to make money by renting out single-family homes is for the owner and the rental agent to be the same entity.

If you then turn to Shilling’s presentation, things start looking positively depressing: he brings up reasons for pessimism that many of us never even consider, along with the much more obvious ones. At the top of the list, of course, is unemployment, which poisons everything. No one wants to buy a house if they don’t feel secure in their job, and people don’t feel secure in their jobs if unemployment is over 9%, where it’s likely to stay for the foreseeable future. And these graphs just speak for themselves:

the-percent-of-mortgages-past-due-is-still-climbing.jpg

image.jpg

when-you-count-shadow-inventory-the-imbalance-looks-even-worse.jpg

given-all-this-its-not-surprising-that-few-folks-are-planning-to-buy-new-houses.jpg

This last one is the most powerful, to me: for all the wheel-spinning that we’ve seen of late in the mortgage-refinance market, the number of people shopping for new homes has been declining steadily for the past five years. I’m sure that Bill Ackman would look at that chart and extrapolate all manner of fabulous mean-reversion, but I can’t see where the new demand is going to come from. Buying a home is no longer the American Dream; people are much more interested in being free of debt. And while Ackman might look at the enormous leverage in the housing market and see opportunity, most Americans I think are now much more aware of the downside risk.

No matter what happens in the housing market, Bill Ackman is always going to have more wealth than he can ever spend in his lifetime. But for those of us without his ability to make large speculative bets, housing is a very scary asset class, while renting is cheaper and much more flexible. I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see the US homeownership rate fall a lot in coming years, back down below even its long-term mean around 64%. And if that happens, prices—both to rent and to buy—are almost certain to fall from current levels.

*Update: Thanks to ckbryant, in the comments, who points out that this is true only in nominal terms, not in real terms.

Comments
64 comments so far

Thanks for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research on this. We got a grab a book from our area library but I think I learned more from this post. I’m very glad to see such great info being shared freely out there.

I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great. I don’t know who you are but certainly you are going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already ;) Cheers!

I am not sure where you are getting your info, but great topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for excellent information I was looking for this information for my mission.

I truly wanted to post a brief comment to be able to thank you for some of the lovely pointers you are sharing at this site. My incredibly long internet search has at the end of the day been honored with excellent facts and techniques to share with my good friends. I ‘d express that most of us site visitors are really lucky to exist in a wonderful site with so many special people with insightful tips and hints. I feel rather blessed to have come across your site and look forward to so many more entertaining moments reading here. Thanks a lot once more for all the details.

You made some good points there. I did a search on the issue and found most people will consent with your site.

I was recommended this website by my cousin. I’m not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my trouble. You are incredible! Thanks!

I think this is one of the most important info for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on few general things, The website style is great, the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers

I want to express my appreciation to the writer just for bailing me out of this type of setting. After looking through the world wide web and getting views that were not beneficial, I assumed my entire life was well over. Existing without the presence of solutions to the difficulties you have solved all through your entire write-up is a crucial case, and ones that might have negatively damaged my entire career if I hadn’t come across your blog. Your own personal mastery and kindness in dealing with all areas was tremendous. I don’t know what I would’ve done if I had not discovered such a step like this. I can now look forward to my future. Thanks for your time very much for this reliable and results-oriented help. I will not hesitate to refer your web site to anyone who requires assistance about this issue.

Thank you so much for giving everyone an extraordinarily special opportunity to read critical reviews from this site. It’s always very enjoyable and jam-packed with amusement for me and my office colleagues to search your web site a minimum of thrice in a week to see the newest tips you have. And definitely, we are at all times amazed with all the wonderful tactics you give. Selected 1 areas in this post are particularly the finest we have all had.

Posted by Read This | Report as abusive

Thanks for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research on this. We got a grab a book from our area library but I think I learned more from this post. I’m very glad to see such great info being shared freely out there.

Someone necessarily assist to make critically articles I would state. This is the very first time I frequented your website page and thus far? I amazed with the analysis you made to create this particular put up incredible. Great process!

You are a very clever person!

The iPhone was missing a significant video camera and its particular the processor is lower versus the additional cell phones, however ?t had been successful! Why does you consider iPad’s going to reduce? . -= sebin’s continue website… Crank up your own apple ipad tablet with the Apps! =-.

Posted by traducere daneza | Report as abusive

Thank you so much for giving everyone an extraordinarily special opportunity to read critical reviews from this site. It’s always very enjoyable and jam-packed with amusement for me and my office colleagues to search your web site a minimum of thrice in a week to see the newest tips you have. And definitely, we are at all times amazed with all the wonderful tactics you give. Selected 1 areas in this post are particularly the finest we have all had.

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/