<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lending Club&#8217;s loss-rate numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/02/07/lending-clubs-loss-rate-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/02/07/lending-clubs-loss-rate-numbers/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:36:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strych09</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/02/07/lending-clubs-loss-rate-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-23852</link>
		<dc:creator>Strych09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 23:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=7217#comment-23852</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a tangent, but I&#039;ve heard anecdotes substantiating this phenomenon in some neighborhoods in California, where the residential mortgages without verified income (the infamous NINJA loans) are performing better than ones where income/employment was verified. And in a lot more cases than you&#039;d imagine, the reason the borrower couldn&#039;t substantiate income was because they were a black market marijuana dealer or grower or wholesaler or distributor, so they had the cash flow to make mortgage payments but not a legitimate job that they could declare to the lendor and hence the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a tangent, but I&#8217;ve heard anecdotes substantiating this phenomenon in some neighborhoods in California, where the residential mortgages without verified income (the infamous NINJA loans) are performing better than ones where income/employment was verified. And in a lot more cases than you&#8217;d imagine, the reason the borrower couldn&#8217;t substantiate income was because they were a black market marijuana dealer or grower or wholesaler or distributor, so they had the cash flow to make mortgage payments but not a legitimate job that they could declare to the lendor and hence the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
