<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The bumpy road ahead for munis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/02/09/the-bumpy-road-ahead-for-munis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/02/09/the-bumpy-road-ahead-for-munis/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dWj</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/02/09/the-bumpy-road-ahead-for-munis/comment-page-1/#comment-23878</link>
		<dc:creator>dWj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=7240#comment-23878</guid>
		<description>Does creating an easier way for people to short munis increase the depths to which they&#039;re likely to fall?  Certainly fear leads to drops below what you might consider a rational value for securities, but not, it seems, to the extent that bubbles overprice them, and if there&#039;s an active short side, it seems the bubble set-up could work in reverse.

(I am, more than usual, completely making things up here.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does creating an easier way for people to short munis increase the depths to which they&#8217;re likely to fall?  Certainly fear leads to drops below what you might consider a rational value for securities, but not, it seems, to the extent that bubbles overprice them, and if there&#8217;s an active short side, it seems the bubble set-up could work in reverse.</p>
<p>(I am, more than usual, completely making things up here.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: y2kurtus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/02/09/the-bumpy-road-ahead-for-munis/comment-page-1/#comment-23872</link>
		<dc:creator>y2kurtus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=7240#comment-23872</guid>
		<description>Until a major muni issuer defaults there will always be a bid for the muni-market. The current bid is just not what muni-issuers got use to in 2010. That NJ issue that got cut back by 40% was only cutback because the managers thought the dislocation in the muni market was a short-term thing due to all the state bk talk going around. 

That the Fed openly scoffed at the idea of entering the muni space didn&#039;t help either. 

Spreads have widened but look at the nominal rates... they are still way below where they were in 2007. How is the outlook for muni&#039;s today compared with the outlook for muni&#039;s in 2007? Night and day different... smooth-sailing then vs armegedon now different. Rates are lower today.

Now that the investment community has decided that the world isn&#039;t comming to an end after all stocks, commodities, and real-estate are all looking better than a 3.5% yield to maturity on 10 year muni paper. Offer investors a respectable return and the demand is there. Even at today&#039;s &quot;elevated&quot; levels the muni market is still UNDERPRICING credit risk and interest rate risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until a major muni issuer defaults there will always be a bid for the muni-market. The current bid is just not what muni-issuers got use to in 2010. That NJ issue that got cut back by 40% was only cutback because the managers thought the dislocation in the muni market was a short-term thing due to all the state bk talk going around. </p>
<p>That the Fed openly scoffed at the idea of entering the muni space didn&#8217;t help either. </p>
<p>Spreads have widened but look at the nominal rates&#8230; they are still way below where they were in 2007. How is the outlook for muni&#8217;s today compared with the outlook for muni&#8217;s in 2007? Night and day different&#8230; smooth-sailing then vs armegedon now different. Rates are lower today.</p>
<p>Now that the investment community has decided that the world isn&#8217;t comming to an end after all stocks, commodities, and real-estate are all looking better than a 3.5% yield to maturity on 10 year muni paper. Offer investors a respectable return and the demand is there. Even at today&#8217;s &#8220;elevated&#8221; levels the muni market is still UNDERPRICING credit risk and interest rate risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
