Comments on: Frank Rich vs the NYT paywall http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/03/04/frank-rich-vs-the-nyt-paywall/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: TFF http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/03/04/frank-rich-vs-the-nyt-paywall/comment-page-1/#comment-24497 Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:12:31 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=7504#comment-24497 I probably wouldn’t, but I should. For all I disagree with some of his positions, Felix raises interesting questions.

]]>
By: y2kurtus http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/03/04/frank-rich-vs-the-nyt-paywall/comment-page-1/#comment-24493 Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:26:15 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=7504#comment-24493 I would.

]]>
By: TinyOne http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/03/04/frank-rich-vs-the-nyt-paywall/comment-page-1/#comment-24488 Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:41:25 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=7504#comment-24488 Felix, I finally figured out why the pay wall issue is so important to you… If it became the norm, nobody is going to pay to read you.

]]>
By: ottorock http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/03/04/frank-rich-vs-the-nyt-paywall/comment-page-1/#comment-24487 Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:40:34 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=7504#comment-24487 FWIW, I did a kind of mental rundown of the blogs and sites on my RSS a couple of weeks ago, splitting them into “good paywall fodder” and “bad paywall fodder” categories. For example, it was easy to imagine Rick Bookstaber’s blog as behind a paywall (if he ever gave up his day job and started blogging more regularly, that is). Meanwhile A Tiny Revolution was obviously bad paywall fodder. And yeah, it does kinda split down to whether the writer(s) in question wants to be part of the conversation or not.

]]>