Comments on: Why isn’t Rajat Gupta facing criminal charges? http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/03/08/why-isnt-rajat-gupta-facing-criminal-charges/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: traduceri romana daneza http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/03/08/why-isnt-rajat-gupta-facing-criminal-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-53647 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:02:03 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=7546#comment-53647 You made some nice points there. I did a search on the topic and found a good number of people will consent with your blog.

]]>
By: midasw http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/03/08/why-isnt-rajat-gupta-facing-criminal-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-24553 Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:15:16 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=7546#comment-24553 Worth looking back at Texas Gulf Sulphur case in 1964. Circumstances almost identical: a director of TG (Thomas Lamont, retired Vice-Chairman of Morgan Guaranty) left a TG board meeting and called Longstreet Hinton, then head of MG’s pension investment to tip him off that rumors of a huge multi-mineral strike by TG in Ontario were true. Hinton then bought stock for various accounts (including his own). SEC did not bring criminal charges, and the issue bled away in a dispute, largely terminological, over what news about itself TG had made public when. Regarding motive in the Gupta matter, Naftalis, G’s lawyer, pointed out that his client had lost $10 million with Raj. Might there have been an agreement involving a make-whole? $10 million was probably real money to Gupta.

]]>