The NYT’s meter starts ticking

By Felix Salmon
March 10, 2011
recommendations page, and you'll see a sidebar which looks a bit like this:

" data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

The NYT’s paywall isn’t live yet, but the meter’s already ticking. Go to the site’s new recommendations page, and you’ll see a sidebar which looks a bit like this:

meter.tiff I’m clearly a heavy user of nytimes.com: I’ve read 155 articles over the past month, according to the system they’ve built at a reported cost of more than $40 million. I’m not at all sure that’s money well spent: my suspicion is that the paywall’s total revenues from the paywall won’t reach that level.

And even at this late date, it seems, the system is doing silly things like make a distinction between “Business,” on the one hand, and “Business Day,” on the other. No, me neither.

As for the Topics, like the wonderfully-named “Blogs and Blogging (Internet),” they take you to barren and unhelpful pages like this one. If the paywall is really a navigation fee, then you’d hope that the NYT would spend a bit more effort making its website in general, and its topic pages in particular, a lot more navigable, with lots of attractive exit points. Instead, there’s nothing — not even a navbar at the top.

It seems to me that the redesigned paywall-focused site — which is feeling decidedly delayed at this point — is still decidedly on the glitchy side. If you’re going to be sending out press releases about your recommendations engine, shouldn’t those recommendations be “Presented by” Thomson Reuters, the launch sponsor, rather than a blank green box?

Still, I’m impressed that my silhouette actually looks a little bit like me. Albeit me on a bad hair day.

Comments
One comment so far

You’re not reading enough arts, Salmon.

Posted by ottorock | Report as abusive
Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/