Comments on: How blogs have changed journalism

By: frhbtol

frhbtol — Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:01:14 +0000

hi, it good & tell us difference between blog and tradional

By: Ian_Kemmish

Ian_Kemmish — Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:57:15 +0000

The executive summary of this appears to be that blogs don’t have sub editors. All of the other consequences appear to have been exactly what could have been predicted from that.

By: IanFraser

IanFraser — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:34:06 +0000

Bit harsh, Radelta?

By: Radelta

Radelta — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:06:13 +0000

From reading your other articles, Felix, I can see how blogging as changed journalism quite a bit.

With blogs I can now see that internet trolls like you who once were confined to only 4chan and youtube, are now able to write for legit news organizations. Amazing

By: DavidMerkel

DavidMerkel — Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:13:16 +0000

“Old-school blogging, where an individual puts their own work up on a dedicated website in reverse chronological order, is clearly on the decline.”

Sad, but true. As for me, I will keep my own site going as long as I can. It’s profitable, though in terms of compensation for my time, it pays about $10/hour, pretax.

The publicity, though, is of considerable value, and I’m only B-list at best.

By: DavidMerkel

DavidMerkel — Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:12:43 +0000

>>Old-school blogging, where an individual puts their own work up on a dedicated website in reverse chronological order, is clearly on the decline.<< Sad, but true. As for me, I will keep my own site going as long as I can. It's profitable, though in terms of compensation for my time, it pays about $10/hour, pretax. The publicity, though, is of considerable value, and I'm only B-list at best.