Perfidious Goldman

By Felix Salmon
March 28, 2011
WSJ has a great article today about that most fickle and capricious of creatures, the Goldman Sachs investment banker.

" data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

betrayal.tiffThe WSJ has a great article today about that most fickle and capricious of creatures, the Goldman Sachs investment banker. He’ll sidle smoothly up to you, buy you a drink at the bar, even get in to bed with you — but it’s not you he wants, he’s really only in it for the money. And if your rich uncle raises his eyebrow in a suggestive enough manner, your paramour is suited up and out the door faster than you can say “secrets of the boudoir.”

A few months ago, the spurned lover was J Crew. Goldman was dating J Crew if not quite going steady: “from time to time over the past several years,” the proxy statement says slightly wistfully, Goldman had “prepared various illustrative financial analyses for the Company.” Ah, those were the days. But sadly they came to an end: a commitment to J Crew would never last long, seeing as how the company was about to be sold. An engagement with the mighty Texas Pacific Group, by contrast, was likely to be a much more lucrative union over the long term. Especially when TPG didn’t just want Goldman’s confidential advice, but also wanted to delve deep into its debt-finance facilities.

But that was just a warm-up for Goldman’s latest show of caddishness. Last summer wireless networking company Clearwire tied the knot with Goldman in a formal ceremony which involved paying a substantial dowry. Yet mere months later, having gotten to know the most private and confidential secrets of Clearwire’s special board committee, Goldman formally transferred its affections to Clearwire’s more buxom step-sister, Sprint Nextel. Oh, the betrayal!

Clearwire’s directors, report Anupreeta Das and Gina Chon, are “upset” — and you can see why! Clearwire was what’s known as a “sell-side client” — one where investment-banking fees are pretty much guaranteed. No matter who ends up buying the company, its financial advisers end up getting paid. Buy-side mandates, by contrast, are much less certain affairs: if you lose the bidding, your client won’t pay you much. Or even anything at all, in many cases.

And like good-for-nothing scoundrels, Goldman’s has decided to go very quiet when called on its behavior. It declined to comment to the WSJ, but did let it be known that “Goldman lawyers reviewed the relationships” before signing off on the treachery.

As if that’s likely to make the Clearwire directors feel any better. And of course they can’t even get their own back. Goldman’s cunning that way: he’ll get you to confide all your deepest and most private secrets. But he’ll never reveal any of his own.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

What’s your objection? Are you accusing Goldman of sharing confidential J Crew information with TPG or Clearwire info with Sprint? That’s a pretty serious charge.

Otherwise it just seems like they’re following the money. Why is that a crime?

Posted by right | Report as abusive

It’s not a crime it’s (just) unethical.

Have to throw in a couple of tweets here too by Interfluidity-

“It is very deeply corrupt, but by socially prevailing norms, it no longer qualifies as corruption”

“Our ironic worldweary cynicism, undermines our ability to tend to institutional hygiene almost entirely. “

Posted by Tangerinebunny | Report as abusive

Are there any Goldman or Sachs family members still involved with the company? Any close relation to Jeffrey Sachs of the Earth Institute (Columbia?)

This is vaguely interesting: Samuel Sachs and Philip Lehman were buddies.

Stray factoids: Jamie Dimon (Papademetriou)’s family and Peter Peterson (Petropoulos) were/are very close to the Rockefeller family. Both have poor immigrant ancestor stories too — Dimon’s grandfather Panos was supposedly a disgruntled busboy who got a job at a branch of the Bank of Athens. Peterson’s father is said to have had a diner.

The Dimon family’s choice of americanized name is curious. There was a prominent Dimon family in the States at the time of the Civil war.

Posted by Uncle_Billy | Report as abusive

great points altogether, you just won a new reader. What may you suggest in regards to your publish that you just made a few days ago? Any sure?

Posted by traducator romana daneza | Report as abusive