Should bloggers get embargoed World Bank reports?

By Felix Salmon
April 8, 2011
Aidwatch it does:

" data-share-img="" data-share="twitter,facebook,linkedin,reddit,google" data-share-count="true">

Does the World Bank have a beef with bloggers? According to Aidwatch it does:

This morning we learned that the World Bank does not consider bloggers journalists. According to Bank policy, it won’t give press accreditation to bloggers, denying them access to the media briefing center where new reports are released under embargo before they are published for the public.

In this case, the report we won’t be allowed to see an advance copy of is this year’s World Development Report, on Conflict Security and Development.

The Bank’s David Theis responds in the comments that they offered to email the report to Aidwatch in advance, but the blog’s Laura Freschi is having none of it:

I applied for the user name and password required to enter the Online Media Briefing Center through the World Bank web page this morning.

After several phone calls with other press center staffers who told me the registration was pending, we spoke and you told me that as a matter of policy, the World Bank does not give early access to blogs.

Your offer to email Bill the report directly a few hours early is not the same as allowing us access to the protected areas of the site for “accredited media outlets.” I don’t know when the WDR report was put online, but presumably those journalists registered by the Bank have had access to that report for days, and did not have to send several emails and make phone calls to get it.

My sympathies are with Freschi on this one. “Bill”, here, is William Easterly, the proprietor of Aidwatch and a former senior Bank staffer. Offering to email an advance copy of the report to Easterly is absolutely not the same as letting Aidwatch bloggers onto the same playing field as other journalists. Reuters, for instance, was shown a summary of the report weeks ago, and was also offered an interview with Sarah Cliffe, one of its lead authors. The full report arrived yesterday, and then there was a conference call today where journalists were walked through its main points. Come Sunday evening, when the embargo is lifted, there will be an informed story up and ready to go.

At the same time, however, Reuters doesn’t have the same specialized interest in the World Development Report that Aidwatch has. The Bank puts out a lot of enormous reports in advance of its two big meetings, in the spring and the fall, and generalist reporters simply don’t have the time, in a world full of important breaking news stories, to give them all the attention they deserve. Dedicated bloggers, on the other hand, do. As Freschi says, you’d “think they would WANT bloggers to write about it”.

On the other hand, I’m not entirely clear why bloggers like Freschi want this kind of insidery pre-publication access to the Bank’s reports. The value of blogs is their status as outsiders — what’s wrong with just downloading the report on Sunday, when it’s made public, taking as much time as is necessary to read it, maybe even phoning up the authors to talk about it, and then writing about it on your blog? Do blogs like Aidwatch really want to play the Bank’s PR game — the one where they put an artificial embargo on reports so that everybody will write about them at the same time without really having digested their contents or having had the opportunity to get reactions from people who know what they’re talking about?

The more media outlets which ignore embargoes the better, as far as I’m concerned. When the World Development Report goes live, Aidwatch should link to it, download it, and start reading it. As and when they find interesting bits, they should blog them. A discussion, ideally, will ensue, around a document which is public. That’s the heart of blogging — not the privilege of being told in advance what to write by a bunch of Bank staffers. So while the Bank’s refusal to grant Aidwatch media-outlet status is silly, Aidwatch’s dudgeon is I think misplaced. Honestly, try being on the embargo list sometime. You’ll love your life once you’re off it.

Update: If Aidwatch adopted the policy of Universe Today, there wouldn’t be an issue here. (h/t Oransky.) Embargoes are a bit like the VIP room at Lot 61: the only reason you’d ever want access is just because you don’t have it.


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

You, Felix Salmon, are a blogger writing on I am also a blogger! Yet I don’t expect, nor is it reasonable, for me to get access to embargoed reports from the World Bank or anywhere else. You, however, should. And I am reassured to learn that you do.

I’m uncertain why Ms. Freschi would want access to embargoed information. She is more a “genuine journalist” than I am with my primitive blogs! But embargoed releases, whether economic, scientific or technology announcements, are often very specialized in content. True subject matter expertise is needed to understand, and sift the wheat from the chaff.

Reuters and industry-specific publications have access to such expertise. Bloggers do not (excluding the blogs of Reuters, the WSJ, NY Times).

I’m with you 100% about this. It is far too easy for disinformation to propagate. It is very arrogant to presume that one is qualified to write as an authority on every subject! Bloggers that are unaffiliated with media have little or no access to experts to confirm understanding. Without informed analysis, coverage of embargoed content is at best a public-relations style press release, and at worse, a disservice to a blog’s readers due to incomplete of flawed interpretation.

Posted by EllieK | Report as abusive


The idea that the world bank would exclude people like you from an “approved access list” is absurd. Isn’t Krugman considered a blogger at this point… I mean he has a blog?

In a fair and balanced world news gathering orginizations like NPR, NYT, WSJ, and your beloved Reuters should be awarded credentials at the entity level and then assign them to who ever they wish.

Best hopes for grayhairs everwhere (a demographic I very recently joined) realizing that web baised journalism is now the most widely consumed.

Keep up the great writing Felix.

Posted by y2kurtus | Report as abusive