<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paul Smalera on spinning off Slate: the video IMterview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/09/02/paul-smalera-on-spinning-off-slate-the-video-imterview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/09/02/paul-smalera-on-spinning-off-slate-the-video-imterview/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:51:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregHao</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/09/02/paul-smalera-on-spinning-off-slate-the-video-imterview/comment-page-1/#comment-30490</link>
		<dc:creator>GregHao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 23:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=9733#comment-30490</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s attractive to think of Slate in the terms that Smalera is thinking about but Slate doesn&#039;t lack for authentic/interesting/thought provoking writers.  In fact, they just laid off a bunch of them!

I&#039;m unconvinced of Smalera&#039;s assertion that Slate would be better off with $1.5MM of some rich guy&#039;s (or combination of rich guys&#039;) money.  Even the guy that he wants to run this newly spun off Slate is probably making, on his own, close to half of that $1.5MM budget.  So then where&#039;s the money to hire interesting writers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s attractive to think of Slate in the terms that Smalera is thinking about but Slate doesn&#8217;t lack for authentic/interesting/thought provoking writers.  In fact, they just laid off a bunch of them!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m unconvinced of Smalera&#8217;s assertion that Slate would be better off with $1.5MM of some rich guy&#8217;s (or combination of rich guys&#8217;) money.  Even the guy that he wants to run this newly spun off Slate is probably making, on his own, close to half of that $1.5MM budget.  So then where&#8217;s the money to hire interesting writers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
