Comments on: Counterparties http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/09/17/counterparties-425/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Danny_Black http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/09/17/counterparties-425/comment-page-1/#comment-31041 Mon, 19 Sep 2011 05:42:45 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=9969#comment-31041 He was saying it was wrong? We must have been reading a different article.

Anyone with a passing acquaintance with the UK media knows what fraudulent, dishonest, self-righteous, hypocritical scum the Guardian are.

]]>
By: Unsympathetic http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/09/17/counterparties-425/comment-page-1/#comment-31039 Mon, 19 Sep 2011 04:15:23 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=9969#comment-31039 Danny, that link goes to a post where someone admits that what they did was wrong. Also, the residence of the Guardian’s parent company, Guardian Media Group, is the UK.

]]>
By: Unsympathetic http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/09/17/counterparties-425/comment-page-1/#comment-31019 Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:03:29 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=9969#comment-31019 Good luck to The Guardian. This isn’t a case of The Guardian having committed a “crime” – rather, this is petty, vindictive BS. Unfortunately, the objective reality is quite simple: the police hadn’t done their job to that point – rather, they were bought off by corporate interests.

I hope the Guardian takes its case to the streets every day until it is finally dropped. Will we ever be rid of the corruption from the Murdoch empire?

]]>
By: kenjd http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/09/17/counterparties-425/comment-page-1/#comment-31005 Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:30:57 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=9969#comment-31005 Not so fast about the Guardian. A demand has been made, but Rusbridger says they will fight.

]]>