Comments on: The NYT’s silly trademark spat http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/10/26/the-nyts-silly-trademark-spat/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: dWj http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/10/26/the-nyts-silly-trademark-spat/comment-page-1/#comment-32395 Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:08:11 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=10735#comment-32395 If the C&D combined with the fact that it’s a really stupid name add up to enough incentive for them to change it, then it will have been for the better, anyway.

]]>
By: RZ0 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/10/26/the-nyts-silly-trademark-spat/comment-page-1/#comment-32390 Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:19:06 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=10735#comment-32390 How is this different from the NBC/Letterman spat 20 years ago, when Letterman had to give up rights to characters he’d created for his NBC show when he moved to CBS?
I’ll guess this is not a tough one for NYT to win.

]]>