<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SecondMarket&#8217;s unnecessary Facebook Fund</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/03/20/secondmarkets-unnecessary-facebook-fund/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/03/20/secondmarkets-unnecessary-facebook-fund/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EricG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/03/20/secondmarkets-unnecessary-facebook-fund/comment-page-1/#comment-37118</link>
		<dc:creator>EricG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=12538#comment-37118</guid>
		<description>Shares Post has had a Facebook fund for a long time. I assume that this is a competitive response to their fund which accepts smaller dollar investments (I believe as low as $50k).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shares Post has had a Facebook fund for a long time. I assume that this is a competitive response to their fund which accepts smaller dollar investments (I believe as low as $50k).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
