Comments on: Why was the JOBS Act so hard to cover? http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/05/why-was-the-jobs-act-so-hard-to-cover/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Foppe http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/05/why-was-the-jobs-act-so-hard-to-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-37634 Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:42:10 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13010#comment-37634 Bucket Shops here we come. Because we haven’t seen enough fraud yet, and there is still money to extract before the second leg of the crash down starts… Still that backlog of 10 million homes that need to hit the market, and whose mortgages’ values need to be adjusted.

]]>
By: rjs0 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/05/why-was-the-jobs-act-so-hard-to-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-37630 Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:29:36 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13010#comment-37630 the “JOBS” propoganda was pretty thorough…i caught both mark thoma & new deal 2.0 promoting it early on, & had to head both them off…

]]>