<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The immigration-averse USA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-38127</link>
		<dc:creator>TFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-38127</guid>
		<description>matthewslyman, thanks for the story!

Whatever the policies, it is healthy for all if they are transparent, consistent, and efficiently implemented. The INS is **THE WORST** bureaucracy in the US in this regard. Byzantine and arbitrary. Doesn&#039;t sound like the UKBA is much better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>matthewslyman, thanks for the story!</p>
<p>Whatever the policies, it is healthy for all if they are transparent, consistent, and efficiently implemented. The INS is **THE WORST** bureaucracy in the US in this regard. Byzantine and arbitrary. Doesn&#8217;t sound like the UKBA is much better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthewslyman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-38124</link>
		<dc:creator>matthewslyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-38124</guid>
		<description>p.p.s. That UKBA officer I mentioned couldn&#039;t even get our names right. Before dismissing us from his office, he hastily drafted an official letter to us, and put my wife&#039;s maiden name at the top, even though we&#039;d been married (with UK marriage certificate) and living in the country for two years already! Still, no apology from the UKBA for wasting our time.

If anyone&#039;s wondering about the benefits of immigration in our case, my wife is a well qualified intelligent person who speaks perfect English. We are both principled and law-abiding people. Her presence here is a huge net positive for me, and by derivation from that and her service elsewhere, her presence is a huge net positive for the UK. But the authorities apparently don&#039;t want it to happen - because of a political atmosphere created and sustained by the tabloid newspapers... Instead, they first let her into the country, and then threaten to break us apart after we have a family already, further threatening to put her under stress that could have caused her to miscarry our second child! Fortunately our children both arrived safely (no thanks to the UKBA).

My wife&#039;s presence has boosted the UK economy and on balance has brought cash into the country, but they still make us pay about £3000GBP total plus lose months of time on an administrative goose-chase, for the privilege of doing them a favour!

Before visiting the UK at my invitation, my wife actually applied three times for a U.S. study visa (with willing and capable U.S. sponsors backing her up) and was refused three times without any explanation. So I apologise to you all that you missed out - she came here instead, at my invitation. We took our time and did things the legal way - and in the end, despite the UKBA&#039;s obstinacy, we&#039;re glad we did things the right way. They don&#039;t have a legal leg to stand on if they want to break our family up now.

BTW I have heard of similar cases happening for people emigrating from the USA to the UK, or vice-versa. It&#039;s not easy, even if you check ALL of the boxes...
~~~
Sorry for hijacking the thread. This story got me going a bit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.p.s. That UKBA officer I mentioned couldn&#8217;t even get our names right. Before dismissing us from his office, he hastily drafted an official letter to us, and put my wife&#8217;s maiden name at the top, even though we&#8217;d been married (with UK marriage certificate) and living in the country for two years already! Still, no apology from the UKBA for wasting our time.</p>
<p>If anyone&#8217;s wondering about the benefits of immigration in our case, my wife is a well qualified intelligent person who speaks perfect English. We are both principled and law-abiding people. Her presence here is a huge net positive for me, and by derivation from that and her service elsewhere, her presence is a huge net positive for the UK. But the authorities apparently don&#8217;t want it to happen &#8211; because of a political atmosphere created and sustained by the tabloid newspapers&#8230; Instead, they first let her into the country, and then threaten to break us apart after we have a family already, further threatening to put her under stress that could have caused her to miscarry our second child! Fortunately our children both arrived safely (no thanks to the UKBA).</p>
<p>My wife&#8217;s presence has boosted the UK economy and on balance has brought cash into the country, but they still make us pay about £3000GBP total plus lose months of time on an administrative goose-chase, for the privilege of doing them a favour!</p>
<p>Before visiting the UK at my invitation, my wife actually applied three times for a U.S. study visa (with willing and capable U.S. sponsors backing her up) and was refused three times without any explanation. So I apologise to you all that you missed out &#8211; she came here instead, at my invitation. We took our time and did things the legal way &#8211; and in the end, despite the UKBA&#8217;s obstinacy, we&#8217;re glad we did things the right way. They don&#8217;t have a legal leg to stand on if they want to break our family up now.</p>
<p>BTW I have heard of similar cases happening for people emigrating from the USA to the UK, or vice-versa. It&#8217;s not easy, even if you check ALL of the boxes&#8230;<br />
~~~<br />
Sorry for hijacking the thread. This story got me going a bit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthewslyman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-38123</link>
		<dc:creator>matthewslyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-38123</guid>
		<description>p.s. In addition to large amount of time spent gathering documentation and applying for that VISA in the first place, I lost another week (yes, a whole week) of work fixing the mess that the UKBA created without reason. And this was after meeting ALL legal requirements, doing EVERYTHING the fully legal way from day 1, and paying an extra $500USD approx. for the UKBA&#039;s &quot;premium&quot; VISA application service.

It&#039;s no wonder people try to get into the country illegally. Not that we would ever do that, mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s. In addition to large amount of time spent gathering documentation and applying for that VISA in the first place, I lost another week (yes, a whole week) of work fixing the mess that the UKBA created without reason. And this was after meeting ALL legal requirements, doing EVERYTHING the fully legal way from day 1, and paying an extra $500USD approx. for the UKBA&#8217;s &#8220;premium&#8221; VISA application service.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no wonder people try to get into the country illegally. Not that we would ever do that, mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthewslyman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-38122</link>
		<dc:creator>matthewslyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-38122</guid>
		<description>System is broken for sure; and not just in the USA.

I visited the UK Borders Agency (UKBA) Sheffield office early last year after meeting ALL official requirements for indefinite leave to remain in the country, and after supplying ALL officially required documentation; and sat there with my pregnant wife and infant daughter only to be told by a man in uniform sitting behind a bullet-proof glass screen that unless we supplied further documentation that wasn&#039;t officially required and which we had already demonstrated was impossible for us to provide, my wife would be deported to Russia. He gave us a deadline of about two to four weeks (including unreliable postal service) to meet his IMPOSSIBLE additional requirements (absolutely not required by law), with the threat that my breast-feeding wife and infant daughter would be permanently separated from each other, and she would be separated from me by the UKBA (though legally married) if we failed to meet the requirements he was arbitrarily applying to our case according to his own whims and misconceptions of the rules. We tried to explain to him the ACTUAL rules as they applied to our case (which we had read thoroughly), but he just ignored us and literally spent 1/4 of the time interviewing us that we had been led to believe the UKBA would actually spend on our case, before moving on to the next case. We complained of course - and kicked up a fuss with our politicians (not the first time with the UKBA). Results of complaint? VISA granted but UKBA officer completely &quot;exonerated&quot; by internal investigation... Our word against his apparently, even though they had a zillion CCTV cameras and microphones pointing at us in their office!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>System is broken for sure; and not just in the USA.</p>
<p>I visited the UK Borders Agency (UKBA) Sheffield office early last year after meeting ALL official requirements for indefinite leave to remain in the country, and after supplying ALL officially required documentation; and sat there with my pregnant wife and infant daughter only to be told by a man in uniform sitting behind a bullet-proof glass screen that unless we supplied further documentation that wasn&#8217;t officially required and which we had already demonstrated was impossible for us to provide, my wife would be deported to Russia. He gave us a deadline of about two to four weeks (including unreliable postal service) to meet his IMPOSSIBLE additional requirements (absolutely not required by law), with the threat that my breast-feeding wife and infant daughter would be permanently separated from each other, and she would be separated from me by the UKBA (though legally married) if we failed to meet the requirements he was arbitrarily applying to our case according to his own whims and misconceptions of the rules. We tried to explain to him the ACTUAL rules as they applied to our case (which we had read thoroughly), but he just ignored us and literally spent 1/4 of the time interviewing us that we had been led to believe the UKBA would actually spend on our case, before moving on to the next case. We complained of course &#8211; and kicked up a fuss with our politicians (not the first time with the UKBA). Results of complaint? VISA granted but UKBA officer completely &#8220;exonerated&#8221; by internal investigation&#8230; Our word against his apparently, even though they had a zillion CCTV cameras and microphones pointing at us in their office!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TinyTim1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-38022</link>
		<dc:creator>TinyTim1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-38022</guid>
		<description>Hey onthelake,

&quot;piddling&quot; $500,000 &gt; $316,000

The UK wants less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey onthelake,</p>
<p>&#8220;piddling&#8221; $500,000 > $316,000</p>
<p>The UK wants less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onthelake</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-38004</link>
		<dc:creator>onthelake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-38004</guid>
		<description>Really Felix. Why do you think the US should sell itself cheap?

TO immigrate to the UK as an entrepenauer  you have to 

(1) have at least 200000 pounds ($31600+ ) AND

(2) enough money to support yourself while living in the UK

To immigrate to the UK as an investor, you have to 

(1) have ability to invest £1,000,000  of your own money in the UK ($1,593,000+) OR

(2) have £2,000,000  ($3,200,000+) or more in personal assets, plus a loan of £1,000,000 or more for investment in the UK.

And that is YOUR country.  

The UK wants a lot more than the piddling $500000 the US asks for from investors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really Felix. Why do you think the US should sell itself cheap?</p>
<p>TO immigrate to the UK as an entrepenauer  you have to </p>
<p>(1) have at least 200000 pounds ($31600+ ) AND</p>
<p>(2) enough money to support yourself while living in the UK</p>
<p>To immigrate to the UK as an investor, you have to </p>
<p>(1) have ability to invest £1,000,000  of your own money in the UK ($1,593,000+) OR</p>
<p>(2) have £2,000,000  ($3,200,000+) or more in personal assets, plus a loan of £1,000,000 or more for investment in the UK.</p>
<p>And that is YOUR country.  </p>
<p>The UK wants a lot more than the piddling $500000 the US asks for from investors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-37989</link>
		<dc:creator>TFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-37989</guid>
		<description>@StefanG, I doubt it is coincidence...

At least some of those countries welcome immigration to feed a booming resource-driven economy. Obviously a healthy economy will suffer less in a recession.

As for the others, immigration drives population growth, and population growth drives many aspects of economic growth. Again, growth is the best cure for a recession.

Suggestions that we are down to &quot;zero net immigration&quot; are very scary. We are in deep economic doo-doo if that doesn&#039;t change. Until now, it has been our primary advantage over Europe and Japan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@StefanG, I doubt it is coincidence&#8230;</p>
<p>At least some of those countries welcome immigration to feed a booming resource-driven economy. Obviously a healthy economy will suffer less in a recession.</p>
<p>As for the others, immigration drives population growth, and population growth drives many aspects of economic growth. Again, growth is the best cure for a recession.</p>
<p>Suggestions that we are down to &#8220;zero net immigration&#8221; are very scary. We are in deep economic doo-doo if that doesn&#8217;t change. Until now, it has been our primary advantage over Europe and Japan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-37988</link>
		<dc:creator>TFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-37988</guid>
		<description>&quot;TFF, you surely see a far better demographic teaching at a private school then you would in a different setting, no?&quot;

Yes and no... The school charges $6k tuition, with substantial needs-based financial aid. We are truly a charitable organization, and many of our families are on public assistance of one kind or another.

&quot;My sister is a teacher at an inner city public school and she is literally a parent to many children who are very neglected.&quot;

We have some of that in common too, though in each case there is SOMEBODY in the family who cares enough to scrape together the money and enroll them.

&quot;If you think the broad African American population is doing just fine I would have to vehemently disagree.&quot;

DanHess, I never used the phrase &quot;doing just fine&quot;, so please do not put words in my mouth. What I said is that I believe the racial attitudes are healing, one generation at a time, at least here in the Northeast. Remember that the generation growing up today is the FIRST generation that wasn&#039;t born into codified segregation and open racial war. And the attitudes you cite are a huge part of why I would never consider living south of the Mason-Dixon line. I&#039;m not that much a glutton for punishment!

&quot;Shouldn’t we do better by these people before taking on the massive challenge of further immigration, most of which is from the third world these days and in need of massive help?&quot;

I see it as two separate questions, personally...

&quot;Shrink from the responsibility if you must, but judgment must be exercised on this issue by somebody.&quot;

Huh? Have you been drinking, Mr. Fox?

&quot;So the problem in the US is not the high level of immigrants, it’s the low levels of tolerance for immigrants.&quot;

Yes -- but also the manner in which immigration has been handled. The US has turned a blind eye to illegal immigration while keeping tight quotes on legal immigration. The opposite policies would be more effective.

It is extremely unhealthy for a society to push otherwise hard-working and honest people outside the bounds of the law. Yes, I know, they aren&#039;t supposed to be here. But they ARE here, and we aren&#039;t about to change that. So find a way to bring them within the law!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;TFF, you surely see a far better demographic teaching at a private school then you would in a different setting, no?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes and no&#8230; The school charges $6k tuition, with substantial needs-based financial aid. We are truly a charitable organization, and many of our families are on public assistance of one kind or another.</p>
<p>&#8220;My sister is a teacher at an inner city public school and she is literally a parent to many children who are very neglected.&#8221;</p>
<p>We have some of that in common too, though in each case there is SOMEBODY in the family who cares enough to scrape together the money and enroll them.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you think the broad African American population is doing just fine I would have to vehemently disagree.&#8221;</p>
<p>DanHess, I never used the phrase &#8220;doing just fine&#8221;, so please do not put words in my mouth. What I said is that I believe the racial attitudes are healing, one generation at a time, at least here in the Northeast. Remember that the generation growing up today is the FIRST generation that wasn&#8217;t born into codified segregation and open racial war. And the attitudes you cite are a huge part of why I would never consider living south of the Mason-Dixon line. I&#8217;m not that much a glutton for punishment!</p>
<p>&#8220;Shouldn’t we do better by these people before taking on the massive challenge of further immigration, most of which is from the third world these days and in need of massive help?&#8221;</p>
<p>I see it as two separate questions, personally&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Shrink from the responsibility if you must, but judgment must be exercised on this issue by somebody.&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh? Have you been drinking, Mr. Fox?</p>
<p>&#8220;So the problem in the US is not the high level of immigrants, it’s the low levels of tolerance for immigrants.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes &#8212; but also the manner in which immigration has been handled. The US has turned a blind eye to illegal immigration while keeping tight quotes on legal immigration. The opposite policies would be more effective.</p>
<p>It is extremely unhealthy for a society to push otherwise hard-working and honest people outside the bounds of the law. Yes, I know, they aren&#8217;t supposed to be here. But they ARE here, and we aren&#8217;t about to change that. So find a way to bring them within the law!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StefanG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-37984</link>
		<dc:creator>StefanG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-37984</guid>
		<description>DanHess: &quot;We have, by a large margin, more immigrants that any other country on Earth.&quot;

The relevant statistic is the percentage of foreign born residents, and by this metric the US is nowhere near the top, with 2009 figures showing 12.5% of US residents foreign born, a number that is dropping. 

Compare with 21% for Switzerland (2008), 24% for Australia (2006), 20% for Canada (2006), 14% for Sweden (2010). Coincidentally or not, these 4 economies weathered the recent economic turbulence exceptionally well.  

So the problem in the US is not the high level of immigrants, it&#039;s the low levels of tolerance for immigrants.

(Some collated figures, some of them a bit old: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_foreign-born_population_in_2005)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DanHess: &#8220;We have, by a large margin, more immigrants that any other country on Earth.&#8221;</p>
<p>The relevant statistic is the percentage of foreign born residents, and by this metric the US is nowhere near the top, with 2009 figures showing 12.5% of US residents foreign born, a number that is dropping. </p>
<p>Compare with 21% for Switzerland (2008), 24% for Australia (2006), 20% for Canada (2006), 14% for Sweden (2010). Coincidentally or not, these 4 economies weathered the recent economic turbulence exceptionally well.  </p>
<p>So the problem in the US is not the high level of immigrants, it&#8217;s the low levels of tolerance for immigrants.</p>
<p>(Some collated figures, some of them a bit old: <a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_foreign-born_population_in_2005)'>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cou ntries_by_foreign-born_population_in_200 5)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TinyTim1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-37982</link>
		<dc:creator>TinyTim1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-37982</guid>
		<description>As an ex L-1 and H1-B holder I share Bruce&#039;s view of the Kafka-esque process.
Also, it is an obvious truism that TSA &amp; USCIS just say &quot;no&quot;.

However, as unattractive a view as it might be, surely a rich immigrant is preferable to a poor one?

From the start the rich guy will spend more and invest more. His chances of &quot;success&quot; are simply far higher than someone without all the advantages that wealth brings.

There is a reason why London welcomes the non-Doms; just ask any property developer in Kensington and Chelsea.

Of course, if your aim is to reduce income inequality then you need to welcome immigrants with below median income/wealth.

But if you want to improve the state of the overall economy adding a whole trache of high-spending rich folk would give you a much needed shot in the arm...

If you let me sell up in the UK and buy a place in the US for $250k with a free green card, I promise you I will come over and spend like a sailor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an ex L-1 and H1-B holder I share Bruce&#8217;s view of the Kafka-esque process.<br />
Also, it is an obvious truism that TSA &#038; USCIS just say &#8220;no&#8221;.</p>
<p>However, as unattractive a view as it might be, surely a rich immigrant is preferable to a poor one?</p>
<p>From the start the rich guy will spend more and invest more. His chances of &#8220;success&#8221; are simply far higher than someone without all the advantages that wealth brings.</p>
<p>There is a reason why London welcomes the non-Doms; just ask any property developer in Kensington and Chelsea.</p>
<p>Of course, if your aim is to reduce income inequality then you need to welcome immigrants with below median income/wealth.</p>
<p>But if you want to improve the state of the overall economy adding a whole trache of high-spending rich folk would give you a much needed shot in the arm&#8230;</p>
<p>If you let me sell up in the UK and buy a place in the US for $250k with a free green card, I promise you I will come over and spend like a sailor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrRFox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-37978</link>
		<dc:creator>MrRFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 04:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-37978</guid>
		<description>@Curmudgeon - you wrote - &quot;No, no, no. My grandparents would never have been cleared through Ellis Island under that criteria.&quot;

Mine either, C - but that was then and this is now. When situations change policies have to change with them.

@TFF - you wrote - &quot; Immigration is good if you see people as assets. * I tend to see people as assets....&quot;

Me too, and there are plenty of immigrant &quot;assets&quot; at Corcoran, Pelican Bay, Soleded and places like that, who are there for offenses that have nothing to do with immo status. Shrink from the responsibility if you must, but judgment must be exercised on this issue by somebody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Curmudgeon &#8211; you wrote &#8211; &#8220;No, no, no. My grandparents would never have been cleared through Ellis Island under that criteria.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mine either, C &#8211; but that was then and this is now. When situations change policies have to change with them.</p>
<p>@TFF &#8211; you wrote &#8211; &#8221; Immigration is good if you see people as assets. * I tend to see people as assets&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Me too, and there are plenty of immigrant &#8220;assets&#8221; at Corcoran, Pelican Bay, Soleded and places like that, who are there for offenses that have nothing to do with immo status. Shrink from the responsibility if you must, but judgment must be exercised on this issue by somebody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanHess</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-37974</link>
		<dc:creator>DanHess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-37974</guid>
		<description>TFF, you surely see a far better demographic teaching at a private school then you would in a different setting, no?  My sister is a teacher at an inner city public school and she is literally a parent to many children who are very neglected.  

We are getting by, but it isn&#039;t pretty.  Study this chart and tell me we are doing fine.
http://filipspagnoli.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/incarceration-rates-us-by-race.jpg

If you think the broad African American population is doing just fine I would have to vehemently disagree.  One young man was already struggling before an unfortunate turn of events, and it would take a Jedi mind trick to believe that what you see below is healthy and vital youth.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/26/the-daily-caller-obtains-trayvon-martins-tweets/

Keep in mind that the individual above seems to have been in the process of dropping out of high school, racking up multiple long suspensions for things like drugs, which would have put him in a category with a nearly 40% incarceration rate.  

By certain measures we are handling our diversity orders of magnitude worse than aparteid South Africa had been.
&quot;In the year 2006 there were 4,789 black males incarcerated for every 100,000 black males in the United States in comparison to South Africa’s apartheid 1993 levels at 873 black males incarcerated for every 100,00 black males.&quot;
http://theblacklistpub.ning.com/forum/topics/black-incarceration-rate-vs-us

Shouldn&#039;t we do better by these people before taking on the massive challenge of further immigration, most of which is from the third world these days and in need of massive help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TFF, you surely see a far better demographic teaching at a private school then you would in a different setting, no?  My sister is a teacher at an inner city public school and she is literally a parent to many children who are very neglected.  </p>
<p>We are getting by, but it isn&#8217;t pretty.  Study this chart and tell me we are doing fine.<br />
<a href='http://filipspagnoli.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/incarceration-rates-us-by-race.jpg'>http://filipspagnoli.files.wordpress.com &nbsp;/2008/08/incarceration-rates-us-by-race .jpg</a></p>
<p>If you think the broad African American population is doing just fine I would have to vehemently disagree.  One young man was already struggling before an unfortunate turn of events, and it would take a Jedi mind trick to believe that what you see below is healthy and vital youth.</p>
<p><a href='http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/26/the-daily-caller-obtains-trayvon-martins-tweets/'>http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/26/the-da ily-caller-obtains-trayvon-martins-tweet s/</a></p>
<p>Keep in mind that the individual above seems to have been in the process of dropping out of high school, racking up multiple long suspensions for things like drugs, which would have put him in a category with a nearly 40% incarceration rate.  </p>
<p>By certain measures we are handling our diversity orders of magnitude worse than aparteid South Africa had been.<br />
&#8220;In the year 2006 there were 4,789 black males incarcerated for every 100,000 black males in the United States in comparison to South Africa’s apartheid 1993 levels at 873 black males incarcerated for every 100,00 black males.&#8221;<br />
<a href='http://theblacklistpub.ning.com/forum/topics/black-incarceration-rate-vs-us'>http://theblacklistpub.ning.com/forum/to pics/black-incarceration-rate-vs-us</a></p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t we do better by these people before taking on the massive challenge of further immigration, most of which is from the third world these days and in need of massive help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-37968</link>
		<dc:creator>TFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-37968</guid>
		<description>DanHess, I don&#039;t know if I can embrace your line of reasoning? I work in a Boston (private) school where no ethnic group comprises a majority of the population, where the students really don&#039;t seem to care. I see integration and acceptance at work on a daily basis.

That said, I agree that the Latin American immigration has been mismanaged. At the very least, immigration needs to be kept within the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DanHess, I don&#8217;t know if I can embrace your line of reasoning? I work in a Boston (private) school where no ethnic group comprises a majority of the population, where the students really don&#8217;t seem to care. I see integration and acceptance at work on a daily basis.</p>
<p>That said, I agree that the Latin American immigration has been mismanaged. At the very least, immigration needs to be kept within the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanHess</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-37966</link>
		<dc:creator>DanHess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-37966</guid>
		<description>Enormous Latin American immigration has been most devastating to the African American community, which has been badly displaced in areas ranging from the trades and construction to agriculture and farming to factory work.  Felix Salmon may not know or care that African American communities have been just crushed, but I am bothered a lot by it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enormous Latin American immigration has been most devastating to the African American community, which has been badly displaced in areas ranging from the trades and construction to agriculture and farming to factory work.  Felix Salmon may not know or care that African American communities have been just crushed, but I am bothered a lot by it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanHess</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/04/16/the-immigration-averse-usa/comment-page-1/#comment-37965</link>
		<dc:creator>DanHess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13249#comment-37965</guid>
		<description>Americans increasingly vote according to tribal and ethnic groups and not based on issues.  African Americans led the way, voting for many years at &gt; 90% for one party irrespective of candidate.  Other ethnic groups are becoming that way too.  If people vote tribally rather than according to issues, democracy has ceased to have any productive function, but is just a tool of oppression and fighting by one group against another.  Such is the case in of course in places such as Iraq, Libya and Egypt, but also in places as varied as South Africa and Venezuela.

I don&#039;t remember where you live, TFF, but the America I know is unbelievably segregated and un-integrated, maybe more so than at any time in its history.  
New York and Chicago take the cake, but my DC is in the running.
http://projects.nytimes.com/census/2010/explorer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans increasingly vote according to tribal and ethnic groups and not based on issues.  African Americans led the way, voting for many years at > 90% for one party irrespective of candidate.  Other ethnic groups are becoming that way too.  If people vote tribally rather than according to issues, democracy has ceased to have any productive function, but is just a tool of oppression and fighting by one group against another.  Such is the case in of course in places such as Iraq, Libya and Egypt, but also in places as varied as South Africa and Venezuela.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t remember where you live, TFF, but the America I know is unbelievably segregated and un-integrated, maybe more so than at any time in its history.<br />
New York and Chicago take the cake, but my DC is in the running.<br />
<a href='http://projects.nytimes.com/census/2010/explorer'>http://projects.nytimes.com/census/2010/ explorer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
