<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Counterparties: Even more bad job market news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/05/04/counterparties-even-more-bad-job-market-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/05/04/counterparties-even-more-bad-job-market-news/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:32:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/05/04/counterparties-even-more-bad-job-market-news/comment-page-1/#comment-38718</link>
		<dc:creator>TFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 07:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13736#comment-38718</guid>
		<description>Yet another article (in the WSJ this time) on the imagined economic efficiencies of renting. It explains quite neatly how the homeownership frenzy of 2005-2006 didn&#039;t work out, then jumps to the conclusion that owning your home must be a Really Bad Idea.

Two problems with that:
* If you intend to pay $12k a year of rent in retirement, rather than the $6k it might cost to own that property, you will need to arrange an additional ~$8k of income (necessarily adjusted for inflation). At the present payout rates, we&#039;re talking hundreds of thousands of dollars of additional savings, just to pay the rent. Is your typical renter saving that kind of money?

* Renting isn&#039;t really cheaper than owning long-term, or landlords would all go broke. Most calculators skew the results by assuming an ownership period of less than a decade (over which time the buying/selling costs dominate). Also, rented properties are generally inferior to those that are owner-occupied. E.g. the &quot;cardboard bungalow&quot; cited in the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another article (in the WSJ this time) on the imagined economic efficiencies of renting. It explains quite neatly how the homeownership frenzy of 2005-2006 didn&#8217;t work out, then jumps to the conclusion that owning your home must be a Really Bad Idea.</p>
<p>Two problems with that:<br />
* If you intend to pay $12k a year of rent in retirement, rather than the $6k it might cost to own that property, you will need to arrange an additional ~$8k of income (necessarily adjusted for inflation). At the present payout rates, we&#8217;re talking hundreds of thousands of dollars of additional savings, just to pay the rent. Is your typical renter saving that kind of money?</p>
<p>* Renting isn&#8217;t really cheaper than owning long-term, or landlords would all go broke. Most calculators skew the results by assuming an ownership period of less than a decade (over which time the buying/selling costs dominate). Also, rented properties are generally inferior to those that are owner-occupied. E.g. the &#8220;cardboard bungalow&#8221; cited in the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dWj</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/05/04/counterparties-even-more-bad-job-market-news/comment-page-1/#comment-38703</link>
		<dc:creator>dWj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 19:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=13736#comment-38703</guid>
		<description>&quot;Voter rolls typically shrink in non-presidential election years and registrations among whites fell at roughly the same rate&quot;

Is it just me, or does this take most of the air out of the rest of the story?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Voter rolls typically shrink in non-presidential election years and registrations among whites fell at roughly the same rate&#8221;</p>
<p>Is it just me, or does this take most of the air out of the rest of the story?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
