Counterparties: Bailouts and money market funds
Welcome to theÂ Counterparties email. The sign-up page isÂ here, itâ€™s just a matter of checking a box if youâ€™re already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints toÂ Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com
Shadow banking has at least one component that non-financial types have actually heard of: money market funds. These are supposed to be low-risk investments, with accordinglyÂ low yields. MMFs are all about keeping your principal intact â€“ a net asset value (NAV) below $1 is generally a mortal failure.
In the fall of 2008, the Reserve Primary Fund famously broke the buck after it was stuck with massive amounts of Lehman Brothers debt, unleashing any manner of craziness into a market that had been treated by many as a savings account.
In congressional testimony today, SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro said the nearlyÂ $2.5 trillion Americans have invested in money market funds are no safer than they were in 2008:
[Money market funds] still remain susceptible today to investor runs withÂ potential systemic impacts on the financial system, as occurred during the financial crisis justÂ four years ago. Unless money market fund regulation is reformed, taxpayers and markets willÂ continue to be at risk that a money market fund can â€śbreak the buckâ€ť and transform a moderateÂ financial shock into a destabilizing run. In such a scenario, policymakers would again be leftÂ with two unacceptable choices: a bailout or a crisis.
More than 300 times since 1970, Schaprio says, fund mangers have injected their own cash to keep NAVs above $1.Â Recently, they’ve supported their funds through “fee rebates“. That’s a particularly invidious way for funds to describe what is in effect life support and why Shapiro has called funds’ stable NAVs “fiction“. The alternative, floating asset values similar to short-term bond funds, is opposed by the industry. Vanguard said they would do “irreparable damage“. Corporate and municipal borrowers also may face higher costs, according to a recent study.
On the New York Fed’s blog, a group of Fed economists and officials make the case that much more is at stake than simply investor returns and borrowing rates: “MMFsâ€™ vulnerability to runs not only puts their investors at risk, but also poses considerable systemic risk to the U.S. financial system”.
It may be tentative good news, then, that money market outflows hit $28.2 billion this week, the highest level in six months. And longer term, the trend is strongly in favor of insured savings accounts over money market funds.Â â€“ Ben Walsh
On to today’s links: