Comments on: Moody’s ratifies interbank mistrust http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/22/moodys-ratifies-interbank-mistrust/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: traducator daneza http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/22/moodys-ratifies-interbank-mistrust/comment-page-1/#comment-53908 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:40:27 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15369#comment-53908 But in fact, Liu Jiangen this is not lost, his mind is persistent and firm, he wanted to go to Hengda, want to play, play in AFC Champions League, more bluntly, he want to get more money

]]>
By: click http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/22/moodys-ratifies-interbank-mistrust/comment-page-1/#comment-53262 Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:32:58 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15369#comment-53262 Accounts sports by brooks analyzer jesse Madden considered that sunday that’s the put out second half’s hold company achieved Summerall the vocal through the category. Madden, Every spicey national football league educate, Had become enjoyed past a few given that hurricane, as well as Summerall’s cool. The two teamed to make 22 times covering up mmorpgs cbs television studios that higher in short sibel..

]]>
By: electronic cigarette http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/22/moodys-ratifies-interbank-mistrust/comment-page-1/#comment-52967 Sat, 27 Sep 2014 17:02:13 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15369#comment-52967 Kimree is a world-leading e-cigarette company. According to Frost & Sullivan, Kimree was the second largest e-cigarette designer and manufacturer in the world in terms of both revenues and production volume in 2013. The Company designs and produces a broad range of e-cigarette products, including disposable e-cigarettes, rechargeable e-cigarettes and e-cigarette accessories. Visit http://www.kimree.com/ for more.

]]>
By: buy fifa 15 coins http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/22/moodys-ratifies-interbank-mistrust/comment-page-1/#comment-52812 Fri, 26 Sep 2014 02:41:13 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15369#comment-52812 A bail bond agent, or bondsman, is any person or corporation that will act as a surety and pledge money or property as bail for the appearance of persons accused in court. Although banks, insurance companies and other similar institutions are usually the sureties on other types of contracts (for example, to bond a contractor who is under a contractual obligation to pay for the completion of a construction project) such entities are reluctant to put their depositors’ or policyholders’ funds at the kind of risk involved in posting a bail bond. Bail bond agents, on the other hand, are usually in the business to cater to criminal defendants, often securing their customers’ release in just a few hours. Bail bond agents are almost exclusively found in the United States and its former commonwealth, The Philippines. In most other countries bail is usually much less and the practice of bounty hunting is illegal.

]]>
By: Foppe http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/22/moodys-ratifies-interbank-mistrust/comment-page-1/#comment-40573 Sat, 23 Jun 2012 05:43:29 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15369#comment-40573 Euhm, felix.. Did you really just write “What’s more, because central banks don’t lend at different rates on the basis of perceived differences in credit risk, it hurts price discovery.”?
I realize that you’re talking about ‘simple’ lending here, but are you really saying that ‘differences in credit risk’ were meaningfully detected before the crisis started? I don’t mean to be unkind, but are you perchance willfully blind? I mean, you can argue that price discovery prior to the onset of the crisis worked, but that the banks all willfully ignored the information, but even then the rates didn’t tell outsiders anything about differences in credit risk. So why not conclude that this “market indicator” too is fictional?

]]>
By: y2kurtus http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/22/moodys-ratifies-interbank-mistrust/comment-page-1/#comment-40565 Sat, 23 Jun 2012 03:06:48 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15369#comment-40565 “It’s easy — and wrong — to dismiss this move by Moody’s as a typical late-to-the-game ratings-agency move.”

Well from this bankers standpoint capital ratios are up about 100% from 2009 and ratings have been lowered.

If Moodys is right today they were so wildly off two years ago, that no one should ever listen to them again. It’s like a weather man who got the tempature exactly right three days in a row… but last week he said it would be 145 degrees. Who would ever listen to that guy again?

]]>
By: crocodilechuck http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/22/moodys-ratifies-interbank-mistrust/comment-page-1/#comment-40558 Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:40:08 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15369#comment-40558 “That’s a good thing, from a systemic perspective: creditors, rather than taxpayers, should take the hit when banks fail”

Tell that to Hank Paulson and Tim Geithner.

“The market has basically given up trying to make fine-grained credit distinctions between different big banks, since the banks’ disclosures are so impenetrable as to make doing so impossible.”

Bring back FASB 157.

]]>
By: dWj http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/22/moodys-ratifies-interbank-mistrust/comment-page-1/#comment-40554 Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:21:21 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15369#comment-40554 I wonder whether it might be less credible to say “we will never bailout banks again” than to say “we won’t bailout the first big bank to fail, but we may backstop banks that would be sunk by the fallout from that.” If creditors are willing to lend to banks, but not to a bank that might be the first to fail, that could have much of the benefit of a full market discipline, with fewer of the credibility constraints.

]]>
By: MrRFox http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/22/moodys-ratifies-interbank-mistrust/comment-page-1/#comment-40548 Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:00:28 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15369#comment-40548 In the situation we are in, not so clear that it’s a bad thing that we have to face this –

“Unless and until that happens — which means, for the foreseeable future — the global banking system is going to look sclerotic and fragile.”

Governments are going to be scooping-up all the money anyone has to lend for a good long while. More will have to be printed. There’s really nothing left for anyone else – unless the Fed prints even more of it. In a situation like that, why are activist-banks even necessary? Or desirable?

Keep Wall Street weak.

]]>