Counterparties: Barclays’ $450 million LIBOR settlement
Welcome to theÂ Counterparties email. The sign-up page isÂ here, itâ€™s just a matter of checking a box if youâ€™re already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints toÂ Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com
It’s always the emails:
â€śalways happy to help,â€ť…â€śDoneâ€¦for you big boy,â€ť
â€śDude. I owe you big time! Come over one day after work and Iâ€™m opening a bottle of Bollingerâ€ť.
Those are the thanks sent to Barclays employees for manipulating key interest rates. The gloating, conspiratorialÂ tone is in full public view now that the bank has settled charges with theÂ CFTC, theÂ DepartmentÂ of Justice and theÂ FSA that it manipulated Libor and Euribor for just over $450 million. CEO Bob Diamond promptly apologized in a written statement, and he and three other top execs will forgo bonuses this year. Breakingviews’ George Hay notes that the scandal confirms the worst of the public’s view of banks and thinks that the “full costs of the affair for Diamond and Barclays will be more than just financial”.
The benchmarks in question represent the rate at which banks in Europe lend to one another. They’re calculated based on banks’ responses to surveys on current market interest rates (the full explanation is available here).Â The settlement documents show that Barclays submitted inappropriately low rates, aiming to keep Libor and Euribor artificially low. Sober Look has a great chart showing an example of just how off the mark Barclays’ rates were:
The importance of Libor and, to a lesser extent, Euribor, is hard to overstate. They are used to value of hundreds of trillions of dollars of financial instruments. Or as Matt Levine puts it, they “set the rates on pretty much all the loans and swaps in the world … CFTC order mentions $350 trillion of [over-the-counter] swaps, $10 trillion of loans, and $437 trillion of CME eurodollar contracts indexed to Libor alone”.
In that context, it’s fair to ask what’s $450 million compared with a scheme like that? Not much, proportionally. And Barclays won’t face criminal prosecutions, because of what the DOJ calls its “extraordinary cooperation”. Individual employees, though, are the subject of ongoing criminal investigation.Â â€“ Ben Walsh
On to today’s links:
Former Spanish central bankers thought Spain would be just fine â€“Â NYT
Dalio: Germany might not save Europe â€“Â Zero Hedge
Full text: The EU’s latest proposal for a closer monetary union â€“Â European Union
Merkel will not accept debt sharing without increased budget control â€“ Reuters