<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Money markets are the new interbank markets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/27/money-markets-are-the-new-interbank-markets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/27/money-markets-are-the-new-interbank-markets/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:48:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: y2kurtus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/27/money-markets-are-the-new-interbank-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-40867</link>
		<dc:creator>y2kurtus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 01:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15579#comment-40867</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be the first to admit that being on the wrong side of David Merkel is generally a bad place to be. 

I&#039;ll also admit that as an FDIC regulated banker I&#039;m biased towards banks being the keepers of safe liquid assets. 

The FDIC has never needed a dime of taxpayer money to meet their obligations. It is an entirely industry funded safety mechanism. It absolutly benifits from the full faith and credit of the treasury backing it up... but it has never called upon that line. 

Money market funds froze in the crisis... it was only an implicit emergency guarentee that kept them from failing in mass. Yes the same was and is true of banks... but again, banks paid for it through good times and in bad via their FDIC premiums. 

Focus for a minute on Merkel&#039;s accurate observation that money funds have a much smaller asset/libility mismatch. He argues that&#039;s a good thing... I&#039;ll respond that the most imporntant assets society requires (from the tractors that plant our crops to the trucks that transport them to the plants that transform corn into cornflakes)... those assets can&#039;t be funded with short term paper. 

As we watch the money market industy shrink remember that it is shrinking from both ends. Consumers have little use for an asset which currently delivers risk without return. Companies have learned that cheap funding is little comfort if it can be withdrawn in a moments notice... espically when they can borrow for 10 years at 2%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be the first to admit that being on the wrong side of David Merkel is generally a bad place to be. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll also admit that as an FDIC regulated banker I&#8217;m biased towards banks being the keepers of safe liquid assets. </p>
<p>The FDIC has never needed a dime of taxpayer money to meet their obligations. It is an entirely industry funded safety mechanism. It absolutly benifits from the full faith and credit of the treasury backing it up&#8230; but it has never called upon that line. </p>
<p>Money market funds froze in the crisis&#8230; it was only an implicit emergency guarentee that kept them from failing in mass. Yes the same was and is true of banks&#8230; but again, banks paid for it through good times and in bad via their FDIC premiums. </p>
<p>Focus for a minute on Merkel&#8217;s accurate observation that money funds have a much smaller asset/libility mismatch. He argues that&#8217;s a good thing&#8230; I&#8217;ll respond that the most imporntant assets society requires (from the tractors that plant our crops to the trucks that transport them to the plants that transform corn into cornflakes)&#8230; those assets can&#8217;t be funded with short term paper. </p>
<p>As we watch the money market industy shrink remember that it is shrinking from both ends. Consumers have little use for an asset which currently delivers risk without return. Companies have learned that cheap funding is little comfort if it can be withdrawn in a moments notice&#8230; espically when they can borrow for 10 years at 2%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crocodilechuck</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/27/money-markets-are-the-new-interbank-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-40854</link>
		<dc:creator>crocodilechuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15579#comment-40854</guid>
		<description>@ y2kurtus:  The shrinking of money market funds is a great thing.&quot;

David Merkel&#039;s second opinion, with some excellent points:

http://alephblog.com/2012/06/23/dont-blame-money-market-funds/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ y2kurtus:  The shrinking of money market funds is a great thing.&#8221;</p>
<p>David Merkel&#8217;s second opinion, with some excellent points:</p>
<p><a href='http://alephblog.com/2012/06/23/dont-blame-money-market-funds/'>http://alephblog.com/2012/06/23/dont-bla me-money-market-funds/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: y2kurtus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/27/money-markets-are-the-new-interbank-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-40839</link>
		<dc:creator>y2kurtus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15579#comment-40839</guid>
		<description>The shrinking of money market funds is a great thing. They were always deceptive for borrower and lender. Circa 2007 GE was a top 10 global company by market cap. Moreover, they were a diversified conglomerate with diverse businesses. 

What better company to finance a third of its longterm assets with overnight money. 

GE was probably the biggest and best example but their was, is, and will continue to be a 10 to 1 global imbalance between assets people want 100% safe and on call at a moments notice and approperate counterparties on the other side of the trade. 

The size and scope of JPM&#039;s cheif investment office is proof positve that even the largest and best run banks in the world can&#039;t deploy mountians of hot money deposits safely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shrinking of money market funds is a great thing. They were always deceptive for borrower and lender. Circa 2007 GE was a top 10 global company by market cap. Moreover, they were a diversified conglomerate with diverse businesses. </p>
<p>What better company to finance a third of its longterm assets with overnight money. </p>
<p>GE was probably the biggest and best example but their was, is, and will continue to be a 10 to 1 global imbalance between assets people want 100% safe and on call at a moments notice and approperate counterparties on the other side of the trade. </p>
<p>The size and scope of JPM&#8217;s cheif investment office is proof positve that even the largest and best run banks in the world can&#8217;t deploy mountians of hot money deposits safely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JW_Mason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/27/money-markets-are-the-new-interbank-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-40831</link>
		<dc:creator>JW_Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 03:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15579#comment-40831</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve written a response to this post. It&#039;s at http://slackwire.blogspot.com/2012/06/in-which-i-dare-to-correct-felix-salmon.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve written a response to this post. It&#8217;s at <a href='http://slackwire.blogspot.com/2012/06/in-which-i-dare-to-correct-felix-salmon.html.'>http://slackwire.blogspot.com/2012/06/in -which-i-dare-to-correct-felix-salmon.ht ml.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JW_Mason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/27/money-markets-are-the-new-interbank-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-40829</link>
		<dc:creator>JW_Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15579#comment-40829</guid>
		<description>(also, 53 percent is wrong -- sorry! -- that&#039;s the share of domestic financial issuers. The overall shift from financial to nonfinancial borrowers is not as dramatic but still qualitatively the opposite of what the OP suggests.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(also, 53 percent is wrong &#8212; sorry! &#8212; that&#8217;s the share of domestic financial issuers. The overall shift from financial to nonfinancial borrowers is not as dramatic but still qualitatively the opposite of what the OP suggests.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JW_Mason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/27/money-markets-are-the-new-interbank-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-40828</link>
		<dc:creator>JW_Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15579#comment-40828</guid>
		<description>The market as a whole. Is there reason to think money market fund holdings are systematically different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The market as a whole. Is there reason to think money market fund holdings are systematically different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suncoke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/27/money-markets-are-the-new-interbank-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-40827</link>
		<dc:creator>Suncoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15579#comment-40827</guid>
		<description>JW-Mason - are you referring to the financial share of the CP market as a whole, or the financial share of the holdings of money-market funds, which Felix is alluding to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JW-Mason &#8211; are you referring to the financial share of the CP market as a whole, or the financial share of the holdings of money-market funds, which Felix is alluding to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JW_Mason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/27/money-markets-are-the-new-interbank-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-40824</link>
		<dc:creator>JW_Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15579#comment-40824</guid>
		<description>(first paragraph is a quote from Felix.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(first paragraph is a quote from Felix.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JW_Mason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/06/27/money-markets-are-the-new-interbank-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-40823</link>
		<dc:creator>JW_Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=15579#comment-40823</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Once upon a time, before the financial crisis, money-market funds were a mechanism whereby individual investors could make safe, short-term loans to big corporates, disintermediating the banks. But all that has changed now. ... the corporates have evaporated away, to be replaced by financials.&lt;/i&gt;

The implication seems to be that before the crisis there was a larger share of nonfinancial commercial paper issuers. This is not true.

Financial businesses have *always* issued the majority of commercial paper. And since the crisis, the financial share has fallen, not risen. In fact, the current share of commercial paper outstanding issued by financials -- 53 percent -- is the lowest it has been since the data begins in 1945.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once upon a time, before the financial crisis, money-market funds were a mechanism whereby individual investors could make safe, short-term loans to big corporates, disintermediating the banks. But all that has changed now. &#8230; the corporates have evaporated away, to be replaced by financials.</p>
<p>The implication seems to be that before the crisis there was a larger share of nonfinancial commercial paper issuers. This is not true.</p>
<p>Financial businesses have *always* issued the majority of commercial paper. And since the crisis, the financial share has fallen, not risen. In fact, the current share of commercial paper outstanding issued by financials &#8212; 53 percent &#8212; is the lowest it has been since the data begins in 1945.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
