Counterparties: Robo-suing is the new robo-signing

By Ben Walsh
August 13, 2012

Welcome to the Counterparties email. The sign-up page is here, it’s just a matter of checking a box if you’re already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints to Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com

Of all the bad practices of the mortgage boom and collapse, robo-signing was among the worst. Unsubstantiated and at times fraudulent foreclosure documents submitted by banks affected more than a 138,000 US homeowners. Following the great series by the American Banker’s Jeff Horwtiz, the NYT’s Jessica Silver-Greenberg reports that some of the same tactics are being employed collecting credit card debt:

As they work through a glut of bad loans, companies like American Express, Citigroup and Discover Financial are going to court to recoup their money. But many of the lawsuits rely on erroneous documents, incomplete records and generic testimony from witnesses, according to judges who oversee the cases.

Lenders, the judges said, are churning out lawsuits without regard for accuracy, and improperly collecting debts from consumers…

“I would say that roughly 90 percent of the credit card lawsuits are flawed and can’t prove the person owes the debt,” said Noach Dear, a civil court judge in Brooklyn, who said he presided over as many as 100 such cases a day.

Americans may be reducing their outstanding credit card debt, but an overhang of unpaid loans remains. And lenders are looking for ways to maximize the value of those loans: JP Morgan is settling claims that it improperly raised minimum credit card payments, and then charged borrowers a fee if they couldn’t pay the new, larger amount. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau may force American Express to refund customers who paid for “identity-theft protection services” without actually receiving the services. It has already won $140 million in refunds from Capital One for selling add-on products customers “didn’t understand, didn’t want, or in some cases, couldn’t even use”. That money fully compensated customers for their losses, which is a far better deal than penalizing a firm $4.8 million after costing customers $300 million. – Ben Walsh

On to today’s links:

Politicking
B of A is not the bank of Obama’s America: the Democratic National Committee moves its capital to a union-owned bank – WSJ
“The Ryan brand is rooted in his ostentatious wonkery…[a] blend of fact, pseudo-fact, & pure imagination” – Jonathan Chait

You say that now
The underwriters and media hyped Facebook pre-IPO, and the sell-side hyped it after – NYT

Settling Limits
From $5 million to $500 million: StanChart’s cost of settling skyrockets – FT

Oxpeckers
Magazines desperate – NYT
Google buys Frommer’s travel for less than $66 million – WSJ

EU Mess
Merkel confronts a crisis: “I don’t do dinner parties, but I’d like to have Vicente del Bosque to supper” – Economist

Metaphors
Criticism of Standard Chartered, Godwin’s law edition – WSJ

Quotes From The Id
Jamie Dimon: “This is not the Soviet Union. This is the USA. It’s a free. Fucking. Country”. – NY Mag

Anti-Social Media
“The iPhone sadly lacks the ability to process a constant stream of hate-filled text messages” – Fast Company

One comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Missing the comments? It looks like the HTML skin is SNAFU. The only way to the blog is through the Reuters front page, not through bookmarks.

Posted by OnkelBob | Report as abusive