Counterparties: Mario Draghi’s shopping list

September 4, 2012

Welcome to the Counterparties email. The sign-up page is here, it’s just a matter of checking a box if you’re already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints to Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com

After Ben Bernanke took the stage in Jackson Hole last week to rather defensively suggest the Fed will act soon, Thursday is Mario Draghi’s turn.

Before we get into the details of what the ECB could announce, a quick update on the European debt crisis: It’s still there. Yields for Spanish and Portuguese debt are at or above the 7% danger zone, and Italy is publicly complaining that their debt costs have little basis in reality. Jens Weidmann, Germany’s top central banker, meanwhile, is reportedly both isolated and threatening to quit over his opposition to the ECB buying debt of struggling EU countries.

In a closed-door meeting in Brussels yesterday, Mario Draghi told the European Parliament that he’d be comfortable buying EU members’ bonds with maturities of three years or so. This, Draghi reportedly said, wouldn’t violate EU treaties. (Bill Gross tweeted that this bond-buying program would be something like writing “2-3 year checks”).

Of course, ECB bond-buying has been the summer’s worst-kept secret. As the WSJ’s Matt Phillips noted, Draghi said this on July 25: “To the extent that the size of these sovereign premia (in Spain and Italy) hamper the functioning of the monetary policy transmission channel, they come within our mandate”.

Draghi’s hints mean that three years into the European debt crisis, the ECB may finally return to limited, direct financing of struggling governments. Analysts, however, are all over the map as to what the ECB may actually announce after its meeting on Thursday, and whether it will involve yield caps.

One safe bet: more political entanglement. Even though Draghi insists the ECB is not political, his actions are still very much wrapped into discussions on what he recently called ”the sharing of powers and of accountability”. Or, as Nomura put it: “Just imagine if the Fed had to play tough with California or worse Texas for example, to effectively impart monetary policy”.

The Economist‘s Charlemagne blog has a great description of Draghi’s predicament: He simply can’t fix Europe without the help of the continent’s leaders:

The euro’s crisis is fundamentally political, not monetary or financial. The ECB cannot fix the euro; it can only buy time. In many ways Mr Weidmann is right to say that, if there is to be mutualisation of risk it should not be done through the back door of the ECB, but rather through the front door (eg, with Eurobonds) and with the agreement of national parliaments. Some in the ECB think that the crisis will have to worsen before politicians take such radical action. Either because he cannot, or because he does not want to, Mr Draghi will not be the lone ranger.

– Ryan McCarthy

With that nod to incremental political change, on to today’s links:

Sinodependency
The frightening implications of a slowdown in China – Economist

Popular Myths
Lazear: There is no structural unemployment – WSJ

The Fed
How the Fed has seriously misunderstood the effects of QE – David Glasner

EU Mess
“The unravelling of the eurozone’s financial integration” – FT Alphaville
The professional class is now beginning to follow the elite out of Spain – NYT

Facebook
Facebook is down 52% since its IPO, and Andrew Ross Sorkin blames one man – DealBook
Felix: There’s only really one Facebook shareholder who matters – Reuters

TBTF
Big banks are increasingly reliant on the cheapest funding available: your deposits – Bloomberg

Economy
$1 billion in debt forgiveness to aid a flagging economy…in Egypt – NYT

The Oracle
What it’s like to play in Warren Buffett’s private poker game – Forbes

Oxpeckers
A wonk is born: the rise of Ezra Klein - CJR
Wired’s investigation of Jonah Lehrer’s work finds “plagiarism, dodgy quotes, and factual inaccuracies” – Slate
Wired officially severs ties with Jonah Lehrer – Wired
What it’s like to fact-check at the New Yorker – Oxford American

Primary Sources
U.S. manufacturing index falls to lowest level in more than three years – ISM

Big Numbers
It costs the U.S. $2 billion to $3 billion per year to power those little red exit signs in office buildings – Boing Boing

Startups
Fred Wilson: Why the collapse of venture capital is good – Technology Review

New Normal
The slow demise of the public corporation – NYT

Hard Landings
Asia’s manufacturing slump gets even slumpier – WSJ

No comments so far

Comments are closed.