Chart of the day, party neighborhood edition

This chart comes from Uber data geek (that is, a data geek who works for Uber) Bradley Voytek. You might recognize it from a blog post of Voytek’s from back in June, headlined “Building the Perfect Uber Party City”.
What Voytek managed to do, back then, was create two “stereotyped patterns” of Uber car usage, based on something called principal component analysis. The first pattern he called “Weekend Component”, and it’s the chart you see above. The second pattern he calls “Weekday component”, and it looks very different indeed. (You can see the two overlaid on top of each other at right.)
Just by looking at these two curves — the red and the blue — Voytek can account for 93% of the way in which demand for Uber cars fluctuates over time. Some cities and neighborhoods are more Weekday; other cities and neighborhoods are more Weekend. (Most, it turns out, are more Weekend than Weekday, at least when it comes to demand for Ubers.) But just about everywhere comes very close to being a mix of the two, rather than something altogether different.
And there are some neighborhoods which correlate very strongly with the weekend curve in particular: Voytek calls these the “party neighborhoods”. In his post, he picked out the most “weekendish” neighborhoods in each of Uber’s cities: North Beach in San Francisco, Soho in New York, and so on. But I was interested in the league table. So, via Voytek, here’s the top 50:
| City | Neighborhood | Weekend Index |
| Chicago | Near North Side | 89.51 |
| San Francisco | North Beach | 88.75 |
| Boston | South Boston | 87.59 |
| Boston | Back Bay-Beacon Hill | 86.37 |
| NYC | Soho | 86.03 |
| DC | Dupont Circle | 85.80 |
| San Francisco | South Of Market | 85.67 |
| San Francisco | Potrero Hill | 85.67 |
| Chicago | Near West Side | 85.62 |
| DC | Au-Tenleytown | 85.44 |
| DC | Downtown | 85.08 |
| DC | Georgetown | 84.90 |
| NYC | Greenwich Village | 84.81 |
| NYC | Tribeca | 84.71 |
| DC | South West | 84.63 |
| NYC | Financial District | 84.53 |
| DC | Foggy Bottom | 84.48 |
| Los Angeles | Santa Monica | 84.38 |
| DC | Capitol Hill | 84.30 |
| NYC | Clinton | 84.27 |
| NYC | Chelsea | 83.59 |
| Boston | East Cambridge | 83.29 |
| NYC | Gramercy | 82.85 |
| Los Angeles | Sawtelle | 82.84 |
| San Francisco | Glen Park | 82.62 |
| Los Angeles | Beverly Hills | 82.58 |
| Boston | Central | 82.25 |
| Boston | South End | 82.09 |
| San Francisco | Chinatown | 81.98 |
| Seattle | First Hill | 81.51 |
| San Francisco | Financial District | 81.29 |
| Seattle | Pioneer Square | 81.27 |
| NYC | Midtown | 81.12 |
| DC | Logan Circle | 81.06 |
| San Francisco | Mission | 80.96 |
| Los Angeles | Westwood | 80.89 |
| NYC | Murray Hill | 80.88 |
| DC | Brentwood | 80.83 |
| San Francisco | Russian Hill | 80.62 |
| San Francisco | Inner Sunset | 80.48 |
| DC | Woodley Park | 80.38 |
| NYC | Little Italy | 80.34 |
| Seattle | Downtown | 80.32 |
| Chicago | Lincoln Park | 80.24 |
| Seattle | Capitol Hill | 80.12 |
| Los Angeles | West Los Angeles | 80.03 |
| Los Angeles | Mid City West | 80.02 |
| NYC | Williamsburg | 80.01 |
| Los Angeles | Mid Wilshire | 79.73 |
| Boston | Fenway-Kenmore | 79.62 |
The Weekend Index, here, is the degree to which Uber usage in the neighborhood in question resembles the red line in Voytek’s chart. Obviously, it’s not all nights and weekends, but it’s skewed that way. Sunday nights are very slow, and then each successive night picks up a bit, and goes on a little bit later, until you get big peaks on Friday and Saturday nights. And across the board, nighttime usage is much heavier than daytime usage.
Voytek also sent me a list of the least “weekendish” neighborhoods that Uber covers. They’re pretty dull, as you might expect. What you might not expect is that the top six are all on the west coast. At the top of the list is Outer Richmond, in San Francisco, followed by Roosevelt and Madrona in Seattle, Visitacion Valley in San Francisco, Greenwood in Seattle, and Leschi in Seattle. Nowhere in New York or Boston or DC even makes the top ten.
The big league table, however, of the most weekendish neighborhoods, is fascinating — just because those tend to be particularly (to use a word that Thomas Frank hates) vibrant. These are the neighborhoods that other cities aspire to; they’re the areas that cause people to want to move to a city, and make them willing to pay high rents to live there.
And if you ever wondered what were the best and worst nights to go out, this Uber chart should answer your question very simply: the later you get in the week, the more crowded any given place is likely to become. That’s pretty intuitive, but it’s always good to see intuitions backed up with empirical data — and it’s easy to see why restaurants that close one or two days a week always choose Sundays or Mondays.



Comments RSS
Why be so quick to equate “patterns of Uber usage” with “patterns of life”? Midtown > Williamsburg??
(Also “What you might not expect is that the top six are all on the west coast” = because west coasters use Uber to get to work and New Yorkers *have subways*.)
This analysis misses a small but important detail, at least for the affected San Francisco weekend neighborhoods: these are areas where people go out that are also poorly served by late-night public transit and the existing taxi system. Potrero Hill, for example, is an area that I live but would never have considered hanging out in at night because I once got strande there for two hours with neither a bus nor a cab. Über makes it accessible. The same could be said for north beach and Soma.
At least in SF, it looks like most of the active areas are neighborhoods with poor public transportation. One of the most active nightlife area (the Castro) is not even listed, but it has fantastic transport links (three metro lines).
At least in SF, it looks like most of the active areas are neighborhoods with poor public transportation. One of the most active nightlife area (the Castro) is not even listed, but it has fantastic transport links (three metro lines).
It appers that half of Frisco is a party ‘hood. I would expect this is because getting a cab anywhere in SF on a Friday or Saturday night can be impossible. You don’t need Uber during other times in the FiDi or SOMA.
I wonder how many other cities are affected by a similar quirk of cab coverage, which would skew the results.
It appers that half of Frisco is a party ‘hood. I would expect this is because getting a cab anywhere in SF on a Friday or Saturday night can be impossible. You don’t need Uber during other times in the FiDi or SOMA.
I wonder how many other cities are affected by a similar quirk of cab coverage, which would skew the results.
It appers that half of Frisco is a party ‘hood. I would expect this is because getting a cab anywhere in SF on a Friday or Saturday night can be impossible. You don’t need Uber during other times in the FiDi or SOMA.
I wonder how many other cities are affected by a similar quirk of cab coverage, which would skew the results.
It appers that half of Frisco is a party ‘hood. I would expect this is because getting a cab anywhere in SF on a Friday or Saturday night can be impossible. You don’t need Uber during other times in the FiDi or SOMA.
I wonder how many other cities are affected by a similar quirk of cab coverage, which would skew the results.
It appers that half of Frisco is a party ‘hood. I would expect this is because getting a cab anywhere in SF on a Friday or Saturday night can be impossible. You don’t need Uber during other times in the FiDi or SOMA.
I wonder how many other cities are affected by a similar quirk of cab coverage, which would skew the results.
I can only speak for San Francisco, but the inclusion of some of those neighborhoods (for instance, Potrero Hill) speaks only to the lack of availability of cabs.