Counterparties: The Fed’s bottomless punch bowl
Welcome to theÂ CounterpartiesÂ email. The sign-up page isÂ here, itâ€™s just a matter of checking a box if youâ€™re already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints toÂ Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com
The Federal Reserve today announced a third round of monetary stimulus, aka QE3, aimed rather directly at the housing market: the Fed will buy $40 billion of mortgage-backed securities a month indefinitely.
The Fed wants to lower yields on mortgage-backed securities and thereby lower mortgage rates for consumers. This is pretty darn close to “Uncle Ben’s Crazy Housing Sale” thatÂ Ezra Klein called for back in July. As the NYT’s Binyamin Appelbaum notes, QE3 has an open-ended timeline and variable targets: the Fed will buy mortgage-backed securities “until the outlook for the labor market improves”. For a close look at exactly what changed since the last Fed statement, the WSJ’s Phil Izzo has the tracked changes, which are significant.
The Fed says that its “highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the economic recovery strengthens”. This, as Felix notes, is a big departure:
The job of monetary policy, in the famous words of Fed chairman William McChesney Martin, is â€śto take away the punch bowl just as the party gets goingâ€ť. The Fed, here, is essentially disowning Martin, and saying that theyâ€™ll keep refilling that punch bowl with high-grade hoochÂ even afterÂ the party is getting going.
Will it work in stimulating growth? Markets approved. Longer term, the picture is murkier. Matt Yglesias thinks the message that the Fed will keep rates low through a recovery is more important than the dollar figure. Tim Duy said before the announcement that the message would be more important than QE3 itself. In term’s of the policy itself, Mohamed El-Erian thinks the Fed is stuck in “policy purgatory:Â incapable of delivering the good economic outcomes it desires, yet unable to exit from an experimental policy stance that risks a widening array of collateral damage and unintended consequences“. — Ben Walsh
On to today’s links: