Opinion

Felix Salmon

Counterparties: Your very tentative housing recovery

September 19, 2012

Welcome to the Counterparties email. The sign-up page is here, it’s just a matter of checking a box if you’re already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints to Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com

Here’s the most recent round of housing data — including housing starts, existing home sales, and homebuilder confidence — in three quotes:

“Housing is clearly in recovery mode.”
“The U.S. housing recovery is for real.”
“The nascent housing recovery has deepened.”

Which isn’t to say today’s numbers are going to make your house suddenly jump in value. The Capital Spectator says the housing recovery is “perhaps downshifting a bit” and notes that newly issued building permits fell by 1% over the previous month. Bill McBride at Calculated Risk calls the existing home sales number “decent”, not because of housing starts but because of the market’s inventory dynamic.

Why should you care about the various measures of housing inventory? For one, they’re good ways of measuring how we’re recovering from the foreclosure crisis. Barclays recently estimated that the market’s “shadow inventory” — homes that are at or near foreclosure — includes some 3.25 million mortgages which are either in foreclosure or at least three months in default. McBride expects reluctant sellers to soon start returning to the market: “this new inventory will probably limit price increases.”

Peter Eavis, following up on a piece he had last month, points to another puzzling dynamic that could hold the housing recovery back. “Pricing in the mortgage market” Eavis writes, “appears to be have gotten stuck.” The spread between mortgage rates and mortgage bond yields, a rough shorthand for mortgage revenue, has jumped in the last year. Even as interest rates are at or near historic lows, Eavis writes, “banks aren’t fully passing on the low rates in the bond market to borrowers. Instead, they are taking bigger gains, and increasing the size of their cut.” — Ryan McCarthy

On to today’s links:

Bad News
Mortgage rates keep falling, and so does lending - WSJ

EU Mess
“Capital flight is leading to the disintegration of the euro zone” - Bloomberg

Departures
Will Goldman’s new CFO “chain-smoke and freak out about liquidity”? - Dealbreaker

New Normal
“The US has more than 100,000 janitors with college degrees and 16,000 degree-holding parking lot attendants” - Bloomberg Businessweek

Modest Proposals
Journalists should work for a Romney presidency — he’s their stimulus plan - Dana Milbank

Billionaire Whimsy
Wherein hedge fund billionaire Louis Bacon compares himself to Erin Brockovich and Henry David Thoreau - Forbes

Real Talk
Ezra: “the thing about not having much money is you have to take much more responsibility for your life” - Bloomberg View

Compelling
Bailouts explain why it may be rational to participate in the last round of a Ponzi scheme - Science Direct

The Fed
Hawks “have not and will not have a significant impact on policy making” - Tim Duy

HUH
“We were born not to be a media company forever. We were born as a mission company forever.” - All Things D

Charts
Patent policy on the back of a napkin - Marginal Revolution

Video
Behold, the ultra-rare fire tornado - Guardian

Grading on a Curve
Goldman is back! Or will be soon — or at least is doing better than its incompetent rivals - Dealbook

Wonks
We tax income, but forget about the real meaning of class - Matt Yglesias

Compelling
Dear America’s CFOs: Sell more bonds now - Distressed Debt Investing

Bold Moves
Google just bought its own Instagram - Wired

Comments
3 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

Felix, seriously, I’m about ready to stop reading (not that you care). You have a political bias, okay, but you guys are frothing at the mouth. The Klein stuff is over the top. I am pretty neutral in politics; I simply want to read stuff that engages my intellect. These links are going way past that.

Posted by Curmudgeon | Report as abusive
 

I don’t know, Curmudgeon, Klein is saying pretty much what I wrote in an e-mail to my brother yesterday afternoon. And before this inanity came to light, I was leaning towards voting for Romney myself.

Romney wrote off 47% of America with the comment, “My job is not to worry about those people. I’ll never convince them that they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives.”

I’m not part of that 47%. I hopefully will never be part of that 47%. But I have enough life experience to realize that Romney missed the mark by a mile and more, and enough acquaintance with people who ARE in that 47% to realize that it is a grossly unjust characterization.

That ain’t politics, that is economic fact. The ONLY connection this has with politics is the fact that the idiot quoted happens to be running for president. But it would be almost as newsworthy if he was just another semi-public corporate big-wig.

Posted by TFF | Report as abusive
 
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •