Counterparties: Is QE3 working?

By Ben Walsh
September 25, 2012

Welcome to the Counterparties email. The sign-up page is here, it’s just a matter of checking a box if you’re already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints to Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com 

Last week, noted inflation hawk and Minneapolis Fed President Narayana Kocherlakota changed his tune and spoke out strongly in favor of keeping interest rates extraordinarily low until at least mid-2015. Now, the president of the Philadelphia Federal Reserve, Charles Plosser, has joined his Dallas counterpart in criticizing the Fed’s latest round of monetary stimulus:

I do not believe that lowering interest rates by a few more basis points will spur further growth or higher employment. Business leaders who have talked to me continue to cite uncertainty about fiscal decisions — here and abroad — as the greatest hindrance to hiring and investment … the central bank can do little to alleviate them.

And as far as households are concerned … They are deleveraging and saving more. It seems unlikely that a small drop in interest rates will overturn the strong desire to save and, instead, induce households to spend more. In fact, driving down interest rates even further may encourage consumers to save even more to make up for lower returns.

Adam Davidson joins Plosser in diagnosing rising savings and a lack of household spending as a key dynamic holding back the economy. Ultimately, though, he comes down on the side of monetary action, despite the risks of unintended consequences. Similarly, Tim Duy doesn’t believe the severity of the crisis should be an excuse for inaction. “Bottom line,” he writes, “policy is effective even in the aftermath of a financial crisis. Don’t let policymakers fool you into believing otherwise”.

The Washington Post’s Neil Irwin plays QE3 professor and gives Dr Bernanke an A- on inflation expectations but only a C+ on mortgage rates. The problem, Irwin writes, is that markets had already priced QE3 into mortgages rates. Now banks are “cutting the mortgage rates they charge customers only gradually; if the banks slashed rates too fast, they would be overwhelmed by the demand from Americans looking to refinance or buy a home and would not be able to handle the load”.

QE3 is also weakening the dollar relative to the euro, according to Barclays’ research team. But that’s not necessarily a bad thing: It makes US products more attractive on the global market. President Obama is unlikely to meet his goal to double exports by 2015 so long as he’s presiding over a strong dollar. And, as Ezra Klein has pointed out before, the Fed knows that “although in the long run, a healthy, productive economy will lead to a stronger dollar, getting there probably requires a temporarily weaker dollar”.  – Ben Walsh

On to today’s links:

It’s a Fair Question
Can Facebook make money without being creepy? – Atlantic

Awesome
An amazing illustrated guide to econo-trolls – Noahpinion

New Normal
Healthcare costs are once again growing faster than the economy – WaPo
Those crazy young people responded to the financial crisis by saving more – WSJ
Lagarde: the world’s central banks are sending “big policy signals in the right direction” – IMF

Liebor
Instant messages show RBS managers condoned Libor fixing – Bloomberg

Alpha
Jeff Gundlach’s “emotions are pretty raw right now” after having $10 million in art stolen from his home – Kevin Roose
A different kind of 1%: The people who need very little sleep – WSJ

Oxpeckers
Interior designer or deputy assistant secretary of state? A classic Vogue correction – Huffington Post
The smartest take on Quartz’s tablet-centric launch – Nieman Lab

Usury
What’s worse than payday loans? Payday loans plus prepaid debit cards – WSJ

Be Afraid
The worldwide bacon shortage is now unavoidable – LAT

EU Mess
Why Merkel backed Draghi’s rescue plan: German banks have $139.9 billion in exposure to Spain, the highest in Europe – WSJ

Inefficient Markets
Traders will pay for astrological market research – Heidi Moore

Comments
3 comments so far

Wow… What happened to that vaunted European safety net?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/25/world/ europe/hunger-on-the-rise-in-spain.html

Posted by TFF | Report as abusive

I am getting so sick of reading tripe like:

“Business leaders who have talked to me continue to cite uncertainty about fiscal decisions — here and abroad — as the greatest hindrance to hiring and investment”

Business leaders worry about demand for their products and, to a lesser extent, their costs of producing those products. They do not worry about the size of the budget deficit or, even more ridiculously, uncertainty over its future size. They might, however, start worrying that the president of the Philly Fed believes this nonsense.

Posted by RueTheDay | Report as abusive

Regarding Usury people should know why and who

Usury used to be illegal in the United States but it was “decriminalized” in 1980–the dawn of financial deregulation. A Democratic president and Congress repealed all interest-rate controls and the federal law prohibiting usury. Thirty years later, American society is permeated with usurious practices–credit cards charging 30 percent and higher, subprime mortgages and other forms of predatory lending, the notorious “payday” loans that charge desperate working people an effective interest rate of 500 percent or more. Businesses, especially smaller firms, are also prey to usury in less direct ways.

http://www.thenation.com/article/trouble -democrats?page=full#

Posted by UselessEater | Report as abusive
Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/