Comments on: Why Margaret Sullivan is right to be wrong http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/12/why-margaret-sullivan-is-right-to-be-wrong/ A slice of lime in the soda Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: KevinMc http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/12/why-margaret-sullivan-is-right-to-be-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-43836 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 18:13:24 +0000 https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=18888#comment-43836 Re: “quasi-criminals”

Nothing quasi- about it. If they are in the country legally the term is invalidated. If they are not in the country legally then it stands.

I’m surprised the topic is still discussed. Neither major political party has demonstrated intent to enforce existing law or write new law. All four combinations (RR,RD,DR,DD) have occupied congress and the white house with the operative phrase has been in play. The science appears to be settled.

]]>
By: MrRFox http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/12/why-margaret-sullivan-is-right-to-be-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-43835 Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:56:39 +0000 https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=18888#comment-43835 — Irony Alert —

Comin’ from someone who almost never engages with his commenters, this – v v – is rich …

“But if there’s one small criticism I would make of Sullivan, it’s that she’s too shy when it comes to engaging with people she disagrees with (or anyone at all, for that matter – Fox).”

]]>