<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CEOs&#8217; self-serving deficit manifesto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/</link>
	<description>A slice of lime in the soda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fpc01</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44262</link>
		<dc:creator>Fpc01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 18:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44262</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you get it. It&#039;s not the tax code. Yes it&#039;s bad, yes it is unnecessarily complicated. It&#039;s been that way for a long long time. Yes it&#039;s unfair in a whole raft of areas. It&#039;s been that way on and off since tax was collected. What was it that made CEO&#039;s start hoarding cash and stop hiring?

It&#039;s not the Democrat&#039;e or Republicans. It makes no difference to the CEO&#039;s out there whether Obama or Romney win. Sure some have the pet projects for their own reasons. Thats not why balance sheets are expanding and investing and hiring are on hold across most industries.

What plunged all CEO&#039;s into a &#039;no hire - no investment mode&#039; is the sequester. You&#039;ve basically told every capital market in the world that the US political system is so dysfunctional that you&#039;d plunge your country into a 3-5% self imposed GDP reduction for no particularly good reason. So why would I commit to capital expansion now into the US? 

Each candidate is using this as a poke at the other: It&#039;s congress, and congress is dysfunctional, completely, blindly irresponsible and that is not likely to be resolved in this election. You have candidates who have signed odd agreements not raise taxes or discuss it in any way and blame the other parties. Well, that is not how comprise works. You&#039;re country is in a revenue crunch and yes that will affect what you can do in the world, so perhaps it is a security threat to the US.

Remember: The US dollar is currently the world reserve currency. I can however see a day where that is stripped away. And I can see that day coming much faster if the sequester actually goes through.

That is a game changer and the next stop for the US would be hyper inflation and depression: That is what got put into motion two years ago when they walked on the deal Boehner and Obama put together. Now?...good luck: Let us know when you are open again, serious again, and are done playing around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you get it. It&#8217;s not the tax code. Yes it&#8217;s bad, yes it is unnecessarily complicated. It&#8217;s been that way for a long long time. Yes it&#8217;s unfair in a whole raft of areas. It&#8217;s been that way on and off since tax was collected. What was it that made CEO&#8217;s start hoarding cash and stop hiring?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the Democrat&#8217;e or Republicans. It makes no difference to the CEO&#8217;s out there whether Obama or Romney win. Sure some have the pet projects for their own reasons. Thats not why balance sheets are expanding and investing and hiring are on hold across most industries.</p>
<p>What plunged all CEO&#8217;s into a &#8216;no hire &#8211; no investment mode&#8217; is the sequester. You&#8217;ve basically told every capital market in the world that the US political system is so dysfunctional that you&#8217;d plunge your country into a 3-5% self imposed GDP reduction for no particularly good reason. So why would I commit to capital expansion now into the US? </p>
<p>Each candidate is using this as a poke at the other: It&#8217;s congress, and congress is dysfunctional, completely, blindly irresponsible and that is not likely to be resolved in this election. You have candidates who have signed odd agreements not raise taxes or discuss it in any way and blame the other parties. Well, that is not how comprise works. You&#8217;re country is in a revenue crunch and yes that will affect what you can do in the world, so perhaps it is a security threat to the US.</p>
<p>Remember: The US dollar is currently the world reserve currency. I can however see a day where that is stripped away. And I can see that day coming much faster if the sequester actually goes through.</p>
<p>That is a game changer and the next stop for the US would be hyper inflation and depression: That is what got put into motion two years ago when they walked on the deal Boehner and Obama put together. Now?&#8230;good luck: Let us know when you are open again, serious again, and are done playing around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observito</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44253</link>
		<dc:creator>Observito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44253</guid>
		<description>I see the economic illiterates are out in full force. Oh well, no wonder Americans are slipping into abject failure. Half the people, the left half, are know nothings.

This post got destroyed by Coyote http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2012/10/you-ungrateful-slobs-should-be-thankful-that-the-federal-government-is-running-up-huge-debt.html, but there is plenty to add, especially about the comments.

Hey there, jimingrapevine, a few questions. Who wrote America&#039;s byzantine and stupid tax code? Was it lefties calling for special rules for their pet political causes? Was it faux conservative corporate cronies pretty much bribing congress critters? Does it make a difference? What did Obama and the Dems do about it when they owned the executive and both houses of congress? Did they do nothing and in fact worsen things with the further tax and regulatory madness of Obamacare? If they really wanted medical coverage for the poor, why didn&#039;t they pass a two page bill saying so?

Calling people &quot;tax cheats&quot; for obeying the tax laws is insane, not? You seem to think that there is some hidden intent in the tax laws that taxes be paid how you think they ought to be. You&#039;re wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the economic illiterates are out in full force. Oh well, no wonder Americans are slipping into abject failure. Half the people, the left half, are know nothings.</p>
<p>This post got destroyed by Coyote <a href='http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2012/10/you-ungrateful-slobs-should-be-thankful-that-the-federal-government-is-running-up-huge-debt.html,'>http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/20 12/10/you-ungrateful-slobs-should-be-tha nkful-that-the-federal-government-is-run ning-up-huge-debt.html,</a> but there is plenty to add, especially about the comments.</p>
<p>Hey there, jimingrapevine, a few questions. Who wrote America&#8217;s byzantine and stupid tax code? Was it lefties calling for special rules for their pet political causes? Was it faux conservative corporate cronies pretty much bribing congress critters? Does it make a difference? What did Obama and the Dems do about it when they owned the executive and both houses of congress? Did they do nothing and in fact worsen things with the further tax and regulatory madness of Obamacare? If they really wanted medical coverage for the poor, why didn&#8217;t they pass a two page bill saying so?</p>
<p>Calling people &#8220;tax cheats&#8221; for obeying the tax laws is insane, not? You seem to think that there is some hidden intent in the tax laws that taxes be paid how you think they ought to be. You&#8217;re wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fpc01</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44252</link>
		<dc:creator>Fpc01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44252</guid>
		<description>The author is not a businessman.

I am a CEO, while we don&#039;t have offices in the US, I can tell you our decision to put off expansion into the US came two years ago when the Tea Party and repulicans walked away from a tax reform bill. Some how the American media has made the heros in that drama.

As CEO, we have a responsibility to our employees and customers. We also have to manage investment and growth. The US is a choice in a world economy, not the only one. The reason the US growth has been so stunted in the last two years happened that day and somehow you missed it.

Your article mentions employment as the major problem: that is partially correct. The major problem, and what the letter I suspect was trying to say, though it doesn&#039;t do a good job is that CEOs in your country and others that want to do business, expand, grow and hire in the US, aren&#039;t. Why? 

If we commitncapital and the tax code changes, we may not be able to recover. If we comit the capital and the fiscal cliff come along, we may not be able to recover. So two years congress effectively told CEOs America is closed for business investment and growth until further notice. 

That&#039;s the message that was sent out. That&#039;s the message received. So we wait until we know and move to other countries. Don&#039;t like it, don&#039;t vote for the guy who walked on that deal, or will on the next one; you got the ball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author is not a businessman.</p>
<p>I am a CEO, while we don&#8217;t have offices in the US, I can tell you our decision to put off expansion into the US came two years ago when the Tea Party and repulicans walked away from a tax reform bill. Some how the American media has made the heros in that drama.</p>
<p>As CEO, we have a responsibility to our employees and customers. We also have to manage investment and growth. The US is a choice in a world economy, not the only one. The reason the US growth has been so stunted in the last two years happened that day and somehow you missed it.</p>
<p>Your article mentions employment as the major problem: that is partially correct. The major problem, and what the letter I suspect was trying to say, though it doesn&#8217;t do a good job is that CEOs in your country and others that want to do business, expand, grow and hire in the US, aren&#8217;t. Why? </p>
<p>If we commitncapital and the tax code changes, we may not be able to recover. If we comit the capital and the fiscal cliff come along, we may not be able to recover. So two years congress effectively told CEOs America is closed for business investment and growth until further notice. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s the message that was sent out. That&#8217;s the message received. So we wait until we know and move to other countries. Don&#8217;t like it, don&#8217;t vote for the guy who walked on that deal, or will on the next one; you got the ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitz2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44241</link>
		<dc:creator>fitz2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44241</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe the pure communist jiberish I am reading here.  Have any of you yahoos ever studied economics?  Who are you people and for that matter who is this idiot author.  If being a CEO is so easy, you should build a company and become one.  Oh, I forgot, you would just rather criticize others who have achieved success.

Paul Krugman is a clown.  He won a Nobel prize, remember, these people gave Obama one in his first year because of a speech.

These dedicated professionals are doing this because they are patriots and not because the are greedy bastards you imply.  Obama and his snakes in Chicago, have ruined our capitalism model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe the pure communist jiberish I am reading here.  Have any of you yahoos ever studied economics?  Who are you people and for that matter who is this idiot author.  If being a CEO is so easy, you should build a company and become one.  Oh, I forgot, you would just rather criticize others who have achieved success.</p>
<p>Paul Krugman is a clown.  He won a Nobel prize, remember, these people gave Obama one in his first year because of a speech.</p>
<p>These dedicated professionals are doing this because they are patriots and not because the are greedy bastards you imply.  Obama and his snakes in Chicago, have ruined our capitalism model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ad_mnres</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44236</link>
		<dc:creator>ad_mnres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44236</guid>
		<description>This article is garbage.  I can say this since the simple minded premise it is based on, that the yield curve is giving us a usable signal is total folly.  The yield curve is being manhandled by a fed that just wants to give a short term boost to the economy.  Saying that the “market” is “begging” CEO’s to borrow is ludicrous.   And the issue with not being urgent, I think most in the room will look way into the future and determine that global warming will be a problem, but on the debt issue you won’t look past your nose at the Wall Street Journal and read about Greece, Spain and Italy.  These countries debt levels are too high and their borrowing cost are going up.  The U.S. is on that trajectory, and by the time the rating agencies and the “market” signal trouble, that snowball will be rolling and it will be hard to stop, thus it is absolutely crucial to start early.  Put a credible plan together to control the debt, decide on a reasonable tax plan, finalize financial regulation, get a credible energy plan in place, stop high jacking healthcare and maybe then businesses will decide that they can invest in America.   The U.S. business man can deal with anything; they just need to know what it is they are dealing with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is garbage.  I can say this since the simple minded premise it is based on, that the yield curve is giving us a usable signal is total folly.  The yield curve is being manhandled by a fed that just wants to give a short term boost to the economy.  Saying that the “market” is “begging” CEO’s to borrow is ludicrous.   And the issue with not being urgent, I think most in the room will look way into the future and determine that global warming will be a problem, but on the debt issue you won’t look past your nose at the Wall Street Journal and read about Greece, Spain and Italy.  These countries debt levels are too high and their borrowing cost are going up.  The U.S. is on that trajectory, and by the time the rating agencies and the “market” signal trouble, that snowball will be rolling and it will be hard to stop, thus it is absolutely crucial to start early.  Put a credible plan together to control the debt, decide on a reasonable tax plan, finalize financial regulation, get a credible energy plan in place, stop high jacking healthcare and maybe then businesses will decide that they can invest in America.   The U.S. business man can deal with anything; they just need to know what it is they are dealing with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KenG_CA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44227</link>
		<dc:creator>KenG_CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44227</guid>
		<description>y2k, they are still accumulating profits from US operations.  I understand the issue with repatriating profits, but even without those profits, they still have enough cash to spend in the U.S.

I&#039;m not suggesting the government tell companies what to do with their cash, but rather that if they don&#039;t put their profits back in circulation, and the government doesn&#039;t replace those profits, there will be consequences that are far worse than deficits.  And I&#039;m not suggesting that taking the money via a tax a the solution, but rather a tool to get businesses to re-invest or share more of their profits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>y2k, they are still accumulating profits from US operations.  I understand the issue with repatriating profits, but even without those profits, they still have enough cash to spend in the U.S.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not suggesting the government tell companies what to do with their cash, but rather that if they don&#8217;t put their profits back in circulation, and the government doesn&#8217;t replace those profits, there will be consequences that are far worse than deficits.  And I&#8217;m not suggesting that taking the money via a tax a the solution, but rather a tool to get businesses to re-invest or share more of their profits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimingrapevine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44226</link>
		<dc:creator>jimingrapevine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44226</guid>
		<description>1). 1. Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2010? Zero. $1.9 billion tax refund.
 Taxpayer Bailout from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department? Over $1.3 trillion.
 Amount of federal income taxes Bank of America would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $2.6 billion.

 2). Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein
 Amount of fed
eral income taxes paid in 2008? Zero. $278 million tax refund.
 Taxpayer Bailout from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department? $824 billion.
 Amount of federal income taxes Goldman Sachs would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $2.7 billion

 3). JP Morgan Chase CEO James Dimon
 Taxpayer Bailout from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department? $416 billion.
 Amount of federal income taxes JP Morgan Chase would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $4.9 billion.

 4). General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2010? Zero. $3.3 billion tax refund.
 Taxpayer Bailout from the Federal Reserve? $16 billion.
 Jobs Shipped Overseas? At least 25,000 since 2001.

 5). Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2010? Zero. $705 million tax refund.
 American Jobs Cut in 2010? In 2010, Verizon announced 13,000 job cuts, the third highest corporate layoff total that year.

 6). Boeing CEO James McNerney, Jr.
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2010? None. $124 million tax refund.
 American Jobs Shipped overseas? Over 57,000.
 Amount of Corporate Welfare? At least $58 billion.

 7). Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer
 Amount of federal income taxes Microsoft would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $19.4 billion.

 8). Honeywell International CEO David Cote
 Amount of federal income taxes paid from 2008-2010? Zero. $34 million tax refund.

 9). Corning CEO Wendell Weeks
 Amount of federal income taxes paid from 2008-2010? Zero. $4 million tax refund.

 10). Time Warner CEO Glenn Britt
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2008? Zero. $74 million tax refund.

 11). Merck CEO Kenneth Frazier
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2009? Zero. $55 million tax refund.

 12). Deere &amp; Company CEO Samuel Allen
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2009? Zero. $1 million tax refund.

 13). Marsh &amp; McLennan Companies CEO Brian Duperreault
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2010? Zero. $90 million refund.

 14). Qualcomm CEO Paul Jacobs
 Amount of federal income taxes Qualcomm would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $4.7 billion.

 15). Tenneco CEO Gregg Sherill
 Amount of federal income taxes Tenneco would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $269 million.

 16). Express Scripts CEO George Paz
 Amount of federal income taxes Express Scripts would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $20 million.

 17). Caesars Entertainment CEO Gary Loveman
 Amount of federal income taxes Caesars Entertainment would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $9 million.

 18). R.R. Donnelly &amp; Sons CEO Thomas Quinlan III
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2008? Zero. $49 million tax refund.

 Eighteen of the 80 CEOs who signed the call for deficit action are actually some of the biggest outsourcers and tax cheats in America. First, they crashed the economy in 2008. They followed that up by taking billions in taxpayer bailout dollars. Their next step was to outsource jobs and evade taxes. Now they are calling for action on a deficit that they helped create over the past four years.

 Bernie Sanders is exposing the hypocrisy of these CEOs, and every American should understand that if Mitt Romney is elected president, these Corporate welfare recipients see potential for unlimited feeding from the taxpayer trough. Only by standing together can we tell these CEOs that the bill has come due, and it is time for them to pa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1). 1. Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2010? Zero. $1.9 billion tax refund.<br />
 Taxpayer Bailout from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department? Over $1.3 trillion.<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes Bank of America would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $2.6 billion.</p>
<p> 2). Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein<br />
 Amount of fed<br />
eral income taxes paid in 2008? Zero. $278 million tax refund.<br />
 Taxpayer Bailout from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department? $824 billion.<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes Goldman Sachs would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $2.7 billion</p>
<p> 3). JP Morgan Chase CEO James Dimon<br />
 Taxpayer Bailout from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department? $416 billion.<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes JP Morgan Chase would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $4.9 billion.</p>
<p> 4). General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2010? Zero. $3.3 billion tax refund.<br />
 Taxpayer Bailout from the Federal Reserve? $16 billion.<br />
 Jobs Shipped Overseas? At least 25,000 since 2001.</p>
<p> 5). Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2010? Zero. $705 million tax refund.<br />
 American Jobs Cut in 2010? In 2010, Verizon announced 13,000 job cuts, the third highest corporate layoff total that year.</p>
<p> 6). Boeing CEO James McNerney, Jr.<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2010? None. $124 million tax refund.<br />
 American Jobs Shipped overseas? Over 57,000.<br />
 Amount of Corporate Welfare? At least $58 billion.</p>
<p> 7). Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes Microsoft would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $19.4 billion.</p>
<p> 8). Honeywell International CEO David Cote<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes paid from 2008-2010? Zero. $34 million tax refund.</p>
<p> 9). Corning CEO Wendell Weeks<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes paid from 2008-2010? Zero. $4 million tax refund.</p>
<p> 10). Time Warner CEO Glenn Britt<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2008? Zero. $74 million tax refund.</p>
<p> 11). Merck CEO Kenneth Frazier<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2009? Zero. $55 million tax refund.</p>
<p> 12). Deere &#038; Company CEO Samuel Allen<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2009? Zero. $1 million tax refund.</p>
<p> 13). Marsh &#038; McLennan Companies CEO Brian Duperreault<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2010? Zero. $90 million refund.</p>
<p> 14). Qualcomm CEO Paul Jacobs<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes Qualcomm would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $4.7 billion.</p>
<p> 15). Tenneco CEO Gregg Sherill<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes Tenneco would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $269 million.</p>
<p> 16). Express Scripts CEO George Paz<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes Express Scripts would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $20 million.</p>
<p> 17). Caesars Entertainment CEO Gary Loveman<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes Caesars Entertainment would have owed if offshore tax havens were eliminated? $9 million.</p>
<p> 18). R.R. Donnelly &#038; Sons CEO Thomas Quinlan III<br />
 Amount of federal income taxes paid in 2008? Zero. $49 million tax refund.</p>
<p> Eighteen of the 80 CEOs who signed the call for deficit action are actually some of the biggest outsourcers and tax cheats in America. First, they crashed the economy in 2008. They followed that up by taking billions in taxpayer bailout dollars. Their next step was to outsource jobs and evade taxes. Now they are calling for action on a deficit that they helped create over the past four years.</p>
<p> Bernie Sanders is exposing the hypocrisy of these CEOs, and every American should understand that if Mitt Romney is elected president, these Corporate welfare recipients see potential for unlimited feeding from the taxpayer trough. Only by standing together can we tell these CEOs that the bill has come due, and it is time for them to pa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: y2kurtus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44223</link>
		<dc:creator>y2kurtus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 01:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44223</guid>
		<description>@KenG_CA

The large cash balances on corporate books are largely beyond our reach. KO, AAPL, GE and most large companies make the vast majority of sales and profits outside of the United States. They would be fools to repatriate those foreign profits and volunteer to pay US taxes on products made abroad and sold abroad. 

Short of one world government, the US can no longer tell AAPL what to do with their cash. If we tried they would just leave. If you want the US treasury to get more out of the Fortune 500 you would need to levy a national sales tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@KenG_CA</p>
<p>The large cash balances on corporate books are largely beyond our reach. KO, AAPL, GE and most large companies make the vast majority of sales and profits outside of the United States. They would be fools to repatriate those foreign profits and volunteer to pay US taxes on products made abroad and sold abroad. </p>
<p>Short of one world government, the US can no longer tell AAPL what to do with their cash. If we tried they would just leave. If you want the US treasury to get more out of the Fortune 500 you would need to levy a national sales tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDN_Rebel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44221</link>
		<dc:creator>CDN_Rebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44221</guid>
		<description>If they are so terrified of the deficit then why did they also object to reversing all the structural deficit item, ie the Bush tax cuts and the excessive military spending. Those two items are 60% of the deficit, call 20% of the deficit from the recession and you&#039;re left with a $200b deficit. Hardly end of the world stuff. Frankly, as Americans pay off more and more of their debt... well, there&#039;s an end to that rainbow and all that beautiful money that was paying off debts every month is gonna start coming back into the economy. As that really takes off, everyone can afford to pay some more taxes. In my opinion it&#039;s beginning to happen already, and so this fiscal cliff is a godsend - a way for politicians to raise taxes and slash military spending without saying so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they are so terrified of the deficit then why did they also object to reversing all the structural deficit item, ie the Bush tax cuts and the excessive military spending. Those two items are 60% of the deficit, call 20% of the deficit from the recession and you&#8217;re left with a $200b deficit. Hardly end of the world stuff. Frankly, as Americans pay off more and more of their debt&#8230; well, there&#8217;s an end to that rainbow and all that beautiful money that was paying off debts every month is gonna start coming back into the economy. As that really takes off, everyone can afford to pay some more taxes. In my opinion it&#8217;s beginning to happen already, and so this fiscal cliff is a godsend &#8211; a way for politicians to raise taxes and slash military spending without saying so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaycee49</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44220</link>
		<dc:creator>jaycee49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44220</guid>
		<description>Lots of words but no real substance behind your opinion piece.  You haven&#039;t made the case for you POV.  The long term threat to our security would result from a collapse of the dollar.  Continuing our current course will ultimately result in an interest burden that can only be resolved by the Fed&#039;s QEternity policy.  If the Fed keeps buying the debt, the end result will be out of control inflation.  If the Fed stops, interest rates skyrocket.  The only resolution is to reduce the debt and deficit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of words but no real substance behind your opinion piece.  You haven&#8217;t made the case for you POV.  The long term threat to our security would result from a collapse of the dollar.  Continuing our current course will ultimately result in an interest burden that can only be resolved by the Fed&#8217;s QEternity policy.  If the Fed keeps buying the debt, the end result will be out of control inflation.  If the Fed stops, interest rates skyrocket.  The only resolution is to reduce the debt and deficit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SockPuppetno23</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44218</link>
		<dc:creator>SockPuppetno23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44218</guid>
		<description>Notionally, someone needs to explain to these C.E.O.s:
0.) The Paradox of Thrift
1.) Taxation and the lowered marginal utility of the billionth dollar.
2.) Huge fortunes (and their reliable transmission to heirs), intellectual &#039;property&#039;, protection in bankruptcy, and limited corporate liability:  all things impossible in the State of Nature, with us made possible by government and so establishing a just debt to the government and its polity
...---only &#039;notionally&#039; because they already know these to be true, but it is in their self-interest that they and those worshipping them are none the wiser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notionally, someone needs to explain to these C.E.O.s:<br />
0.) The Paradox of Thrift<br />
1.) Taxation and the lowered marginal utility of the billionth dollar.<br />
2.) Huge fortunes (and their reliable transmission to heirs), intellectual &#8216;property&#8217;, protection in bankruptcy, and limited corporate liability:  all things impossible in the State of Nature, with us made possible by government and so establishing a just debt to the government and its polity<br />
&#8230;&#8212;only &#8216;notionally&#8217; because they already know these to be true, but it is in their self-interest that they and those worshipping them are none the wiser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: financebrains</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44209</link>
		<dc:creator>financebrains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44209</guid>
		<description>Who wrote this article...The re-elect Obama campaign?? Utter economic idiocy. First, where did they dream up that chart? In the last 4 years the national debt had grown from $11 Trillion to $16.2 Trillion. GDP was $13.2 Trillion in 2008 vs. 13.5 Trillion today!!! I don’t know what this 3 and 4 silliness is on the y-axis of the graph. Don’t people watch the news? The economy has been poking along at 2% annual growth for the past several years while the debt has been growing at an annual clip of 11% (5 times as fast) That all ignores the $43 Trillion unfunded liability of Medicare and the $17 Trillion unfunded Social Security unfunded liability. In total, the US has $75 Trillion of obligations, a fact that is never discussed.  Don’t take my word for it, google “financial statements of the United States” and get these numbers directly from the US Treasury Department in the annual report signed by Mr. Obama’s own Treasury Secretary.
The people who commented on this article should use screen names as should the author as they embarrass themselves by showing extreme economic ignorance and pro-Obama blindness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who wrote this article&#8230;The re-elect Obama campaign?? Utter economic idiocy. First, where did they dream up that chart? In the last 4 years the national debt had grown from $11 Trillion to $16.2 Trillion. GDP was $13.2 Trillion in 2008 vs. 13.5 Trillion today!!! I don’t know what this 3 and 4 silliness is on the y-axis of the graph. Don’t people watch the news? The economy has been poking along at 2% annual growth for the past several years while the debt has been growing at an annual clip of 11% (5 times as fast) That all ignores the $43 Trillion unfunded liability of Medicare and the $17 Trillion unfunded Social Security unfunded liability. In total, the US has $75 Trillion of obligations, a fact that is never discussed.  Don’t take my word for it, google “financial statements of the United States” and get these numbers directly from the US Treasury Department in the annual report signed by Mr. Obama’s own Treasury Secretary.<br />
The people who commented on this article should use screen names as should the author as they embarrass themselves by showing extreme economic ignorance and pro-Obama blindness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevedwight</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44205</link>
		<dc:creator>stevedwight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44205</guid>
		<description>Where were these guys when Bush/Cheney were putting in place massive structural deficits during an economic expansion? When their buddies in the finance industry were busily loaning trillions of dollars into a housing bubble?  Now they are lecturing us about debt?  Wretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where were these guys when Bush/Cheney were putting in place massive structural deficits during an economic expansion? When their buddies in the finance industry were busily loaning trillions of dollars into a housing bubble?  Now they are lecturing us about debt?  Wretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed62</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44200</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44200</guid>
		<description>So these CEO&#039;s of big corporations tell us the Fedl. Govt. should be more fiscally responsible??

Perhaps we should begin with:

Ex-Im Bank export subsidies:  Boeing, GE, Caterpillar

Bank Bailouts:  J. P. Morgan Chase, B of A, Goldman Sachs

Farm and ethanol subsidies:  John Deere, Continental Grain

Life Insurance as a tax shelter:  Aetna, State Farm, Allstate

&#039;Carried Interest&#039; tax treatment: Knight Capital, Pershing Square

Mortgage Interest deduction: Weyerhaeuser

And, if you must ask: &quot;broaden the tax base&quot; is a faintly-disguised euphemism for higher taxes on low income workers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So these CEO&#8217;s of big corporations tell us the Fedl. Govt. should be more fiscally responsible??</p>
<p>Perhaps we should begin with:</p>
<p>Ex-Im Bank export subsidies:  Boeing, GE, Caterpillar</p>
<p>Bank Bailouts:  J. P. Morgan Chase, B of A, Goldman Sachs</p>
<p>Farm and ethanol subsidies:  John Deere, Continental Grain</p>
<p>Life Insurance as a tax shelter:  Aetna, State Farm, Allstate</p>
<p>&#8216;Carried Interest&#8217; tax treatment: Knight Capital, Pershing Square</p>
<p>Mortgage Interest deduction: Weyerhaeuser</p>
<p>And, if you must ask: &#8220;broaden the tax base&#8221; is a faintly-disguised euphemism for higher taxes on low income workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FifthDecade</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/10/25/ceos-self-serving-deficit-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-44188</link>
		<dc:creator>FifthDecade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/?p=19212#comment-44188</guid>
		<description>Excellent article, well written and informative. Sadly the people who most need to read it a) won&#039;t read it and b) won&#039;t believe it even if they do. Sadly politics is becoming far more partisan and divisive, and while rich men fund idiots like the Tea Party and the mainstream press is controlled by their sympathisers, nothing&#039;s going to change.

There are just too many people who hate the idea of a black President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article, well written and informative. Sadly the people who most need to read it a) won&#8217;t read it and b) won&#8217;t believe it even if they do. Sadly politics is becoming far more partisan and divisive, and while rich men fund idiots like the Tea Party and the mainstream press is controlled by their sympathisers, nothing&#8217;s going to change.</p>
<p>There are just too many people who hate the idea of a black President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
