Opinion

Felix Salmon

Counterparties: Is your bank too big to fail?

By Felix Salmon
November 2, 2012

Welcome to the Counterparties email. The sign-up page is here, it’s just a matter of checking a box if you’re already registered on the Reuters website. Send suggestions, story tips and complaints to Counterparties.Reuters@gmail.com.

The Financial Stability Board (FSB), the group that tries to coordinate global bank regulation, yesterday released its annual list of “systemically important financial institutions” — the 28 banks which really are too big to fail. According to the NYT’s Peter Eavis, it’s the “list that big banks don’t wish to be on”. And it will be very familiar to Americans:

Eight are from the United States: Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, State Street and Wells Fargo. The list has its own hierarchy, with the banks split into four buckets. In the top bucket are Citigroup and JPMorgan, along with Deutsche Bank and HSBC.

As Eavis implies, being at the top of this list is not something to be celebrated. Banks in the top bucket face a 2.5% capital surcharge on top of the standard 7% rate that Basel III requires. Banks in the lower buckets face surcharges ranging from two to one percent. These regulations won’t be fully in force until 2019, so there’s plenty of time if you, like Deutsche Bank, don’t currently have the requisite capital.

As the phrase implies, being too-big-to-fail isn’t on balance a bad thing: as Steve Waldman notes, the biggest banks “get showered with loan guarantees, cheap public capital, and sneaky interventions to help them recover at the public’s expense”. That’s not fair to smaller institutions, and ends up distorting everyone’s economic incentives.

The Bank of England’s Andrew Haldane recently said that there are no intrinsic economies of scale in banks bigger than $100 billion in assets. They do, however, enjoy lower borrowing costs, thanks to their implicit government guarantee. Which means that the bigger they get, the more support they enjoy. That should help ease the pain of those higher capital requirements. — Ben Walsh

On to today’s links:

Dispersed States
Mexican drug cartels kidnap and enslave engineers to build secret radio network – Wired

Primary Sources
US economy adds 171,000 jobs in a reassuringly solid NFP report – BLS

#Sandy
Inside the mad hunt for gas on the East Coast – NYT
Should gas prices be soaring? – Felix

New Normal
The bad jobs news: “the gigantic, overlooked underclass of long-term unemployed workers” – Catherine Rampell

Hope/Change/Etc.
Meet the man in charge of securing Obama’s legacy (and possibly the next Treasury secretary) – National Journal

Truthiness
How to use the jobs report to make any case you want for Obama’s reelection chances – Quartz

Popular Myths
Being nice to business has nothing to do with delivering economic growth – Matt Yglesias

Wonks
“A bet is a tax on bullshit” – Alex Tabarrok

Comments
2 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

My bank is not only ‘too big to fail’, HSBC is also ‘Too Big To Prosecute’ for the drug trafficking and homicide offenses that it is into up to its corporate-eyebrows, and rightly so – it’s one of TR’s biggest customers, which is kinda like holding an editorial ‘Get Out Of Jail Free’ card issued by God Himself.

Posted by MrRFox | Report as abusive
 
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •